Then they drove away in a vehicle, presumably, a UAZ. Overall, the abductors spent about an hour at the pumping station.

Pierre Gravina: “Dr. J.

Le 17 mai, nous vous avons remis contre décharge une lettre vous signifiant votre mise à pied à titre conservatoire et vous convoquant à un entretien le jeudi 27 mai 2007 à 9h30.

Officer M. punched the applicant’s brother in the head and chest five times, and strangled him until he was unconscious using a squared piece of a broken wooden chair.

    Following the search, which was carried out on 14 June 2013, various pieces of equipment and other materials related to CD-ROM production were withheld [1] . 5 .

In any event, the applicant had merely contested the outcome of the criminal proceedings and failed to challenge the evidence against him despite being aware of it.

But the antibody that’s eating away at him has been there for some time. It’s been cultured for years in precisely those religious environments that Andreotti likes best.

    The first applicant and his wife were not aware of their son’s detention until 11 December 2000, because they presumed that he had remained overnight with his relatives. 2.

It appears that at a certain moment the applicant’s glasses were broken and the police took them away.

Special considerations may apply in exceptional cases where an applicant first avails himself of a domestic remedy and only at a later stage becomes aware, or should have become aware, of the circumstances

At about 2 a.m. around twenty men parked two “Ural” trucks about 150 metres away and came to the house on foot.

It was one and a half kilometres away and located at a higher altitude than the hamlet.

Furthermore, the awards made by the Constitutional Court had not been paid to date and there were no means of enforcing such claims.

A bed which could not be removed from the house in one piece due to its size was also, by special decision of the Enforcement Authority, destroyed and thrown away.

The doctors did not deem it necessary to remove the bullet pieces as they were not life-threatening. 8.

      The applicant became aware of Judge T’s membership of the Freemasons through a newspaper report of 9 September 1995.

Referring to the Supreme Court’s opinion, the applicants argued that it had been proved in the proceedings that the hospital had been aware, or ought to have been aware, of the specific circumstances suggesting

B. had tried to help, but Savestin had been carried away by the water current. B. had returned home. 9.

In the present case the investigator used his own initiative exactly because he was aware of such circumstances. 40.