Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215654
17 janvier 2022
17 janvier 2022
However, on 14 March 2013 the Sofia Court of Appeal reversed this decision, dismissing the applicants’ claim.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC004517205
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
On 21 June 2005 the Odessa Regional Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal, finding no grounds for quashing the first instance court judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141422
27 janvier 2014
27 janvier 2014
On 20 March 2007 the Bitola Court of Appeal (“the second-instance court”) allowed an appeal by the plaintiffs and annulled the applicants’ recruitment.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1029JUD000751405
29 octobre 2009
29 octobre 2009
The preparatory hearing was subsequently held on 13 March 2002. 17 .
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138459
22 octobre 2013
22 octobre 2013
It had been other evidence that had led to his finding of guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0110JUD005340610
10 janvier 2013
10 janvier 2013
of Ille-et-Vilaine, between 1 March 1999 and 31 March 2000?
Source officielleciv2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C201441
26 septembre 2013
26 septembre 2013
X... du désistement de son pourvoi à l'égard de la caisse de Crédit mutuel d'Aix-en-Provence et de la société Zyli's ; Sur le premier moyen : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Aix-en-Provence, 16 mars
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167325
13 septembre 2016
13 septembre 2016
On 31 March 2014 the Nizhniy Novgorod childcare authorities also issued their opinion on the case, finding that it was in the second applicant’s best interest to live with his mother.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0920DEC007774213
20 septembre 2016
20 septembre 2016
2007; UsI-3938/12-8 of 28 March 2013 and UsI-709/13-4 of 3 March 2014). 21.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC006571313
26 novembre 2013
26 novembre 2013
The Constitutional Court’s decision of 21 March 2013 (odluka Ustavnog suda Už 1712/2010) 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC007369301
30 mars 2004
30 mars 2004
This decision did not formally quash the decision of 9 March 2000 nor did it contain any reference to it. However, it bore the same file number as the decision of 9 March 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207627
21 décembre 2020
21 décembre 2020
In a summary ruling of 19 March 2012 the HAC refused to grant leave to the applicant’s appeal in cassation, without providing any specific reasons.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229060
2 novembre 2023
2 novembre 2023
On 23 March 2017 the Ankara Batı 6 th Court of First Instance (“the trial court”) convicted the applicant for damaging public property under Article 152 § 1 (a) of the Criminal Code and sentenced
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177193
31 août 2017
31 août 2017
:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Communicated on 31 August 2017 THIRD SECTION Application no. 25051/11 OOO IZDATEL EZHAYEV A.K. against Russia lodged on 21 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216653
3 mars 2022
3 mars 2022
On 8 March 2012 the applicant filed a criminal complaint against M.Y., alleging sexual assault. The public prosecutor rejected her complaint on account of the delay in reporting the incident.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233480
4 avril 2024
4 avril 2024
51445/09, §§ 49-54, 24 March 2016), did the domestic courts assess the reasonableness of the suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence he had been charged with and did the domestic
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248867
30 janvier 2026
30 janvier 2026
One of these reports, dated 29 March 2019, noted that the applicant had tenderness in the coccyx area and near the left shoulder blade.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55904
18 décembre 2000
18 décembre 2000
{ page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2000)140 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179936
13 décembre 2017
13 décembre 2017
On 4 March 2009 S.F. and T. concluded a second loan agreement. On 4 March 2009 Y.A. and T. amended the mortgage agreement to state that it also covered the loan agreement of 4 March 2009.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-154053
30 mars 2015
30 mars 2015
On 20 September 2011 the Kurgan Regional Court upheld those findings on appeal.
Source officiellePage 26 sur 1230