The other two members of the majority held that same-sex relationships were not, at that time, recognised by the Strasbourg case-law as a form of family life within the meaning of Article 8.

Three prisoners were held in this cell. - Between 28 February and 23 March 2010 the applicant was held in cell no.   129 measuring 7.5 square metres.

That period was unreasonable and the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

The next hearing was held on 14 October 1999.

There was no TV room available to inmates held in cell no. 7/1.

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

At that time, that sum was the equivalent of 2,077 Euros or six months of the applicant’s salary, net.   2.

by a letter of the President of the Commission dated 26 May 1999;   Whereas at the 659th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission's proposals, held

    In the case of the second applicant, the Supreme Administrative Court also held that the letter sent by a non-governmental organisation to the head of the relevant unit of the Border Guard

The section is formulated on the assumption that a main hearing is held and, accordingly, enumerates exceptions to this general rule.

Despite this, it was clear from custody registers that persons were on occasion held overnight in such cells.

KK: Hello, it is K. The applicant: Hello. K.K.: Honorata, what is your house number? The applicant: Twenty. K.K.: Okay, I’ll be there in a second, okay? The applicant: Okay. K.K.: Thanks.” 11.

    Between 18 September 1997 and 15 April 1999, the court held ten hearings.

Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of European and International Affairs. 4.

In the judgment given on 29 June 1995, which concerned three cases, Lord Browne-Wilkinson held, among other things, that public policy considerations were such that local authorities should not be held

    The domestic court held that the applicant’s personal rights, namely his right to dignity and to humane treatment, had been infringed in that he had been held in severely overcrowded cells

water over his head. 26.

He was diagnosed with a closed head injury; a first-degree cerebral contusion; a subarachnoid haemorrhage; contusions on the chest, head, face and left elbow; and post-traumatic hybrid sensorineural hearing

    On 21   September   1995 the District Court held a hearing.