The expert had confirmed that the applicant had experienced bruising and swelling to his left knee.

to which only the authorities had had access.

Š.A. had received a call and had gone out.

She had arrived after the shot had been fired and had helped to cordon off the area.

Therefore, his words had not been directly addressed to judge D., and had in fact had some bearing on the subject of security since the applicant had mentioned a specific case in order to denounce the

However, the applicant had not been mentioned only in passing in the impugned judgment: it had contained extensive findings of fact also concerning the applicant and had assessed evidence taken at the

The burden of proof thus fell on the Government, which, as they had accepted, had to demonstrate convincingly that the applicant had nevertheless had a fair trial as a whole.

The Government had provided the Court with an outline of the investigative steps which had been taken.

Stefanov had jumped from the window of his own accord, whether he had been deliberately pushed or forced into a situation where he had had no other option but to jump.

The authorities considered that the applicant’s parents had “had no malicious intent” and had “believed that they had acted in the best interests of their child”.

CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Vu les articles 205 et 1371 du code civil, ensemble la règle "aliments ne s'arréragent pas" ; Attendu, selon le jugement attaqué, que Hadda

in which the evidence had been obtained.

She had attended it only twice. Girls had attended the sauna naked and O.B. had massaged them. She had had good relations with O.B.

Witness K. stated that A. had come to them holding her shoulder and telling that she had been hit. Some days later A. had showed him the applicant saying that this was the man who had hit her.

The respondent State had provided specific information as to how many certificates had been issued of an expressed intention to apply for asylum, and how many applications for asylum had been submitted

This had been all the more so if the person with whom a complainant had wished to maintain contact had been the victim of behaviour which had been deemed detrimental by the domestic courts.

which had been at stake.

She had not had any problems with her pregnancy with V. and had never attempted to abort it.

The Federal Prosecutor General had determined that Colonel K. had not incurred criminal liability mainly because he had been convinced, at the time of ordering the airstrike, that no civilians had been