société SPGO, chargé, le 20 janvier 1991 à partir de 21 heures, d'effectuer en voiture une ronde de surveillance de bâtiments industriels, s'est rendu, vers 22 heures 30, en compagnie d'un ami, sur le bord

Y... et la société Bouffard-Mandon, ès qualités ; Sur le moyen unique, tel que reproduit en annexe : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Agen, 1er juin 2005), rendu sur renvoi après cassation (Civ. 2

    Following the applicant’s appeal, the Aliens Appeals Board, on 16 April 1997, quashed the Immigration Board’s decision and referred the case back for re-examination.

Dominique Bouffard, pris en sa qualité de syndic au règlement judiciaire de la société Pierre Isnard, demeurant à Bordeaux (Gironde), 34 rue de Macau, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 30 juin 1992 par

In January 1964 the Board appointed a child welfare officer (tilsynsvaerge) to supervise the children.

The Board did not find any reason to come to a different conclusion.

X... pouvait prétendre néanmoins conserver son classement en 15e catégorie bien que ce classement impliquât qu'il fut demeuré chef mécanicien à bord des pilotines, ce qu'il n'a jamais soutenu et ce qui

marche normale et l'a en conséquence condamné ; "aux motifs propres que le 1er juillet 1999, à Saint-Laurent-Le-Minier, Michel X... circulait sur la route départementale 110 en direction du Vigan, à bord

    Proceedings before the County Social Welfare Board 37.

would be postponed further than the Parole Board had envisaged.

On 3 February 2004 the tender was awarded by the Adjudication Board to Welcomeurope Consortium. 2.

The authority of the Refugee Appeals Board is restricted to deciding asylum-relevant issues, and it is thus outside the Board's authority to determine whether an alien who does not meet the conditions

On 7 June the Board refused.

    In February 2009 a Parole Board Review took place. The Parole Board decided on the papers that the applicant should remain in detention.

    The applicant brought the Board’s decision before the District Court, which, on 21 April 2017, quashed it on grounds of erroneous application of the law and remitted the case to the Board

Police Board.

The President’s decisions were based on an authorisation of 3 November 2009 issued by the Board of the Poznań Regional Court ( Kolegium Sądu Okręgowego – “the Board”).

On 24 March 2005 the Arbitration Board rejected the applicant’s objection, adopting the reasoning of the Executive Board. 17.

     The applicants appealed to the Board of Transport arguing inter alia that the County Administrative Board's decision was not based on convincing reasons and that the decision was