Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111786
31 mai 2012
31 mai 2012
It acknowledged that the applicant had interest in the proceedings; not least because of her inheritance rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224232
20 mars 2023
20 mars 2023
According to this decision the applicant could not be heard by the first instance court because he had been detected Covid-positive.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2659
5 juin 2007
5 juin 2007
The husband denied the allegation and declared that the applicant had run away with him because her family was against their marriage.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7627
7 mai 2013
7 mai 2013
before the Supreme Administrative Court: the first applicant applied to the court to annul her pay-slip; the second applicant – the Public Service Trade Union Confederation – sought judicial review because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217871
11 mai 2022
11 mai 2022
The Social Security Authority refused to use the data provided by the applicant for the period from 1984 to 1993 because her employer at the time failed to submit social security reports after 2003, was
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175516
19 juin 2017
19 juin 2017
On 9 May 1998 the company’s accounts were frozen because of unpaid debts.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC005576200
30 mars 2004
30 mars 2004
The court pointed out that the burden of proof was on the applicant who failed to show that he had been denied entry because of his Chechen origin.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD000196714
22 novembre 2016
22 novembre 2016
Because of M.K.’s delusional behaviour, there was a risk that he would harm himself or others.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD002533306
22 octobre 2009
22 octobre 2009
E.V. : “I cannot say for certain, because it all happened relatively fast and I was shocked, since I saw it as a personal threat to me because I connected the incident which had taken place before I entered
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1106DEC003667297
6 novembre 2001
6 novembre 2001
The applicants complain under Article 9 of the Convention that Mehmet Kurnaz was detained and ill-treated because of his membership of the United Socialist Party.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC004680699
22 mars 2001
22 mars 2001
He claimed that the mine’s production had dropped because its exploitation had provisionally become unprofitable.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156196
17 juin 2015
17 juin 2015
The hearing of 27 May 2011 was adjourned until 21 June 2011 because the first applicant and his counsel did not appear.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121863
29 mai 2013
29 mai 2013
required personal data in respect of the voters was incomplete; and (i) one signature was invalid because it was not in hand ‑ writing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC002011602
24 octobre 2006
24 octobre 2006
She was eligible for provision of State housing because at that time she worked as a judge in the Dzerzhinskiy District Court of Volgograd.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116DEC004745317
16 janvier 2024
16 janvier 2024
He did so because, after hearing some rumours, he had started suspecting that those judges had been paid by the Bar Association for some services they had rendered for it. 6 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC003607022
23 septembre 2025
23 septembre 2025
They argued that C.N.I. lacked impartiality because of the reason described in paragraph 12 below.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201710
13 février 2020
13 février 2020
February 2019, delivered by the Oradea Court of Appeal, of the general tort law proceedings brought by the applicants, who are police officers, against a private party seeking non-pecuniary damages because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208205
27 janvier 2021
27 janvier 2021
Before the domestic courts the applicant argued that she had a job in a school in Zagreb and that she had often stayed in Zagreb over night at her mother’s or her daughter’s place because of work, the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215048
15 décembre 2021
15 décembre 2021
Has the applicant suffered a significant disadvantage because of the changes to the collective agreement and because of the courts’ refusal to examine his claims on their merits?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209984
13 avril 2021
13 avril 2021
The Deputy Minister of Justice and Security, relying on the applicant’s criminal record, made the impugned decision because he considered that the applicant posed a threat to public order.
Source officiellePage 26 sur 1499