On 6 May 1998 the applicant made a request that a date be set for a hearing. Of the two hearings held on 11 March and 7 June 1999, neither was adjourned at the request of the applicant.

The facts part of the judgment also mentioned a letter from the public notary stating that they had no record of such a POA being made.

    The Government did not make any submissions as regards the conditions in which the applicant had been detained. 8.

In that respect, the applicants noted that the experts had indeed made an assessment of whether there had been a decrease in the value of the non-expropriated part of the property and concluded that there

In this connection, the Court also refers to statements made by various international bodies calling for the provision of accommodation and care adapted for the needs of asylum-seeker minors as opposed

The applicant made no submissions or any plea in relation to that issue.

The Court refers to the observations made by the CPT (see paragraph   9 above) and Ambassador Tomáš Boček, Special Representative of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on migration and

20339/03) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Ukrainian national, Mr   Valentyn

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

They claimed that the company had not made certain payments to the Fund in 2002-2005, and, as a result, that period was not taken into account when their pension was calculated.

    The first and third applicants submitted that the statements made by the officials in the press coverage of the criminal proceedings against them had breached the principle of presumption

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Any arguable plea of incitement places the courts under an obligation to examine it and make conclusive findings on the issue of entrapment, with the burden of proof on the prosecution to demonstrate that

As regards application no. 18970/17, in respect of the obligation on behalf of a private company to allow the applicant’s access to a plot of land, the Court notes that the applicant failed to make appropriate

The Court finds that, following the applicants’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

Nor does it discern, from the domestic courts’ judgments, that her studies abroad, of which they had been made aware, were a material consideration for them in deciding on her eviction or that of her child

application mainly concerns, under Article 6 §§   1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer and the use of statements he had made