COMPLAINTS   The applicant complained that the State authorities had not enforced the judgment given in her favour in due time and that there was a lack of effective remedies in that respect, relying

The applicants assumed that they were federal servicemen. 9.

They concurred in recommending that the applicant undergo compulsory treatment in a closed setting.

They claimed that the requisition constituted a de facto expropriation rather than a measure to control the use of property.

    They further argued that the applicant could have lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court.

They considered that this interpretation was contrary to that provided for in law.

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non ‑ exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that

They noted that cell no. 26 had had artificial and natural light and a ventilation system and they submitted that the toilet area in the cell had been separated off with a screen.

    Mr Sh. and the man named Oleg or Vladimir were released later that day. They stated that they had been detained by a detachment of the police special force from Novosibirsk. 13.

    The Court reiterates that it is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant

They insisted that they had exhausted all possible remedies but that these had proved futile. B.     The Court's assessment 51.

By agreement between the three applicants, it was therefore decided that the third applicant should adopt the first applicant so that they could become a real family in the eyes of the law. 12.

She also states that her husband and children were beaten up by the police in the course of the same events.

Relying essentially on the Forensic Committee’s opinion, the District Court held that the applicant’s disability was mainly due to natural diseases rather than his accident.

In addition, they noted that, while being compulsory, the vaccination had not been forced or violently imposed, and therefore that the applicant, being an adult of thirty ‑ four years of age at

The number of inmates kept there at the same time as the applicant varied from twenty-four to thirty-three. 59.

They had intended to return in February or March 1992, but were told by friends that they could not because they had been “erased”.

    The applicant also complained under Article 5 of the Convention that there had been no reasonable grounds for him to remain in detention during such a lengthy period. 3.

they had “suggested that there had been manipulation of the facts by the public authorities, for which Mr Pellerin and the SCPRI had knowingly been responsible”.