However, as this declaration had had only prospective effect, it had not impacted on the applicant’s situation.

de nationalité Française né le 02 Avril 1984 à L'HAY LES ROSES (94) Profession : Sans profession, demeurant ...

Kolyadova O. had been told by M.P. that he had grown up in a happy, well-to-do family; he regularly received letters from home.

It was considered that it had been him who had stuck them, that the image on them was obscene, and that the inscription was offensive to the staff; b) deprivation of the right to receive food parcels from

had not issued a formal expropriation order. 4.

which, in fact, had been the case.

COUR D'APPEL d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE [Adresse 2] [Localité 1] N° RG 24/06823 - N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7I-BNDCB Chambre 1-9 Ordonnance n° 2025/M014 Mme [D] [M] ÉPOUSE [S] Représentant : Me Hajer

the latter had subjected his son. 2.

The court also noted that many summoned witnesses, including three persons who had bought drugs from the applicant under instruction of the police, had not appeared and could not be located as they had

On 20 April 2006 they had had to return in order to inquire about his refusal to follow the treatment they had prescribed to him and to which he had agreed.

It remains unclear whether the applicant has lodged a statement of appeal afterwards and, if so, whether his appeal has been heard. 2.

    The Government submitted that the applicants had not exhausted domestic remedies in so far as they had failed to exhaust ordinary civil remedies.

applicant’s claim had already been satisfied.

With regard to the land plot of 0.24 ha, the court indicated that since the registration of their title in 1994, the applicants had been fully aware that the boundaries and measurements of the parcel had

It had been established that the applicant had eight teeth left. It was presumed that he had not taken appropriate care of his teeth prior to his imprisonment.

However, he had then pleaded guilty because of pressure from the trial judge and because he had wished to be released sooner and had no funds to pay for a lawyer.

    The applicant also submitted that she had explained in her request of 4 May 2017 that she had had to register the child with the forename “ Abbas ” because she had needed to take him abroad

obstruct the investigation, that he had permanent residence in the “MRT”, that many witnesses had already testified and the case against him was very clear.

had not changed.