Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152957
16 février 2015
16 février 2015
The prosecutor’s office then allowed the applicant’s complaint, finding that investigation had been ineffective. It ordered that the decision of 2 June 2006 be annulled and the investigation resumed.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170235
7 décembre 2016
7 décembre 2016
On 24 May 2013 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the first-instance court’s decision was justified.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2128257-2258296
26 septembre 2007
26 septembre 2007
Summary of the facts She entered the United Kingdom on 28 March 1998 under an assumed name. She was seriously ill, and was admitted to hospital.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221133
24 octobre 2022
24 octobre 2022
avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } Published on 14 November 2022 FIRST SECTION Application no. 15624/20 J.C. against Poland lodged on 13 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242253
14 février 2025
14 février 2025
Upon the applicant’s appeal, the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the lower court’s findings in a final decision of 15 March 2021.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0405DEC000577772
5 avril 1974
5 avril 1974
The Supreme Court, however, confirmed the findings of the Regional Court.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68463-68931
28 octobre 1999
28 octobre 1999
The application of it by the domestic courts, in particular the Court of Cassation in its judgments of 2 March 1995, had made it pointless to continue the proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0617DEC005961900
17 juin 2004
17 juin 2004
The applicant arrived in Lithuania on 2 March 1998 with a transit visa valid until 4 March 1998. On the above date the immigration police ordered the applicant to leave Lithuania by 9 March 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205152
14 septembre 2020
14 septembre 2020
2020 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the Supreme Court’s repeated authorisation of the applicants’ extradition to Uzbekistan following findings of this Court that the applicants’ rights
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184200
29 mai 2018
29 mai 2018
Romania (nos. 18780/04 and 13111/05, 27 March 2012).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201933
24 février 2020
24 février 2020
On 12 March 2013 the investigative authorities ordered an additional forensic medical examination of the applicant’s injuries.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD001435205
13 juillet 2010
13 juillet 2010
In the absence of any finding in the first medical report, the Court considers that the marks described in the latter report must have occurred during the subsequent days while the applicant was still
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD003438805
12 avril 2011
12 avril 2011
on the merits has been adopted or where a definitive finding on the merits has not yet become final, adoption of a definitive finding on the merits shall be suspended.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144055
14 avril 2014
14 avril 2014
hearing scheduled for 29 March 2007.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117768
27 février 2013
27 février 2013
On 24 March 2005, the Minister rejected the applicant’s asylum application, finding that he had failed to dispel the doubts about his account.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD005417200
10 janvier 2008
10 janvier 2008
The applicant was detained sometime on 19 March 1999 and was held overnight. 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4754
18 février 1999
18 février 1999
On 15 March 1990 the applicant petitioned the Naples District Court for judicial separation from his wife, Mrs R.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3245
8 août 2006
8 août 2006
The authorities replied that the alleged incident was not imputable to members of the security forces, that the investigations previously carried out into the matter had resulted in a finding that there
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221132
25 octobre 2022
25 octobre 2022
2021; and the findings made in the report by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Poland carried out from 11 to 22
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2097
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
In March 2001 the administrator of a building in which the applicant and his wife had lived in Poland brought a private prosecution against the applicant for slander.
Source officiellePage 25 sur 1230