CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

88 661 résultats pour « Mady »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0113DEC002205793

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 1997

13 janvier 1997

       By letter dated 5 and 19 May 1995, the applicant's representatives made further submissions. The Government provided further material by letter dated 15 June 1995.

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 4434

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0104DEC006661109

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2011

4 janvier 2011

They may choose not to do so and await a political solution.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1981:117

CJUE

21 mai 1981

21 mai 1981

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 1981.#Giorgio Morbelli v European Commission.#Case C-156/80.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1982:154

CJUE

13 mai 1982

13 mai 1982

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 May 1982.#Agatha Alaimo v European Commission.#Case C-16/81.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1984:182

CJUE

17 mai 1984

17 mai 1984

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 May 1984.#Paul Bähr v European Commission.#Case C-12/83.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1975:70

CJUE

28 mai 1975

28 mai 1975

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Reischl delivered on 28 May 1975. # Berthold Küster v European Parliament. # Case 79-74.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1979:140

CJUE

31 mai 1979

31 mai 1979

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 31 May 1979.#Frederick Newth v European Commission.#Case C-156/78.

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:1992:67

droit européen

22 mai 1992

22 mai 1992

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 1992.#Moat v European Commission.#Case T-72/91.

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:1994:57

droit européen

20 mai 1994

20 mai 1994

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 1994.#Obst v European Commission.#Case T-510/93.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1987:209

CJUE

7 mai 1987

7 mai 1987

Judgment of the Court of 7 May 1987.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Case C-189/85.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1969:14

CJUE

6 mai 1969

6 mai 1969

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 May 1969.#Andreas Reinarz v European Commission.#Case C-17/68.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC005150808

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

During this operation, many officers died, and the sergeant in command of the post was captured. Many of the soldiers fled to other villages.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13422

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2021

7 octobre 2021

trafficking, had worked without contracts and work permits, had their documents taken away and their freedom of movement restricted by their employer, and had not been paid their wages starting from May

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD001049683

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1987

8 juillet 1987

The specified grounds include those on which a place of safety order may be made (see paragraph 31 above). (ii) Relevant orders 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD004253802

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kazmin v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC007401912

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

The judgment of 31 May 2002 thus became final and enforceable. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0119JUD004383807

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2012

19 janvier 2012

These allegations were made in a letter from the complainant’s solicitor to the applicant’s religious order. In September 1995 a formal police complaint was made.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:1218DEC000285466

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 1967

18 décembre 1967

  Article 12:   Because the right to marry is dependent on the production of a birth certificate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0307DEC004034808

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2014

7 mars 2014

The court made no decision on this until 29 December 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159293

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2015

19 novembre 2015

A preliminary hearing took place on 25 May 2010 at which the “TRNC” representative made a settlement offer of GBP 20,000, which the applicant declined, believing it to be far too low.

Source officielle