Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Brčić , a lawyer practising in Biograd na Moru; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning the applicant’s right to a fair hearing to the Croatian Government (“the Government”), represented

    The applicant complained that his right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of his requests to appear in court.

police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant had been subjected (see paragraph 8 above), thus undermining the applicant’s right to a fair hearing

    The applicant submitted to the Court a self-produced transcript of the hearing held on 24 January 2013 before the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that his conviction in absentia and the failure to reopen the proceedings ab initio had deprived him of a fair hearing.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    Relying on Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, the applicants complained that they had not committed any administrative offence and that they had not had a fair hearing, since the domestic

According to the applicant, he was not duly notified about the date and time of the hearing because the notice of the hearing was delivered to him three days after the hearing, on 23   October 2009

    At a hearing held on 3 May 2013 at the applicant’s trial Y.E. again denied the incriminating statements he had made in respect of the applicant at the investigation stage, arguing that he

    A further challenge by the applicants to the CoL hearing the case was dismissed on 17 July 2020 by the Judge for Extraordinary Remedies (‘JER’), who held that the CoL – who had had the duty

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The trial court scheduled ten hearings between 16 October 2013 and 22   September 2015, most of which were adjourned.

Deputy Registrar   President     APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (failure to notify the applicant of the other party’s submissions or of a hearing