CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 730 résultats pour « Farissy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

private and family life, home and communications.

Source officielle

Page 25 sur 1237

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12506

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

On 24   September 2013 the daughter was placed in the care of a foster family with a view to adoption. On 27 September 2013 the applicant was acquitted on the above-mentioned charges.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

    The central issue in this case is whether the procedures followed respected the applicants’ family life or constituted an interference with the exercise of the right to respect for family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD007659411

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

It noted that the case was governed by the RSFSR Marriage and Family Code of 30 July 1969 because the child had been born before 1 March 1996, that is to say before the new Family Code of the Russian Federation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7389

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

(b)     Applicability – Although the child had been placed in a foster family soon after birth, the first applicant had continued to visit him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2015

12 mars 2015

    The Family Act 59.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121JUD006039915

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

) about the stable family environment they had while living with their mother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD003864709

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD000149017

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

Throughout that meeting the father and other members of his family had been allowed to be present.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD002293511

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2013

24 octobre 2013

    Family Code of the Russian Federation 106.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD000056920

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2022

23 juin 2022

When the ban would lapse, she could apply for family reunification. Moreover, it was possible to exercise family life in Djibouti if her family wanted to take residence there. 27 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD001468022

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2024

8 octobre 2024

    In March 2022 the Family Court ordered that the applicant’s contact with the children be increased to three times per week for a longer duration and that the family be assisted by a specialist

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9319

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2014

21 janvier 2014

In agreement with the social services, her son was placed with a foster family during the day. Three months later, however, this family was no longer prepared to accept the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD001444711

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0712JUD000636013

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2018

12 juillet 2018

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0923JUD004607516

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2021

23 septembre 2021

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0827JUD005817214

Admin. suprême

27 août 2019

27 août 2019

authorities to undertake reasonable steps to ensure that surviving members of the family are informed of the death of their family member (see Lozovyye v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126JUD002899520

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

He still had family in Tunisia, where he went every year. He owned a house in Tunisia and he could find work there. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206JUD000614216

Admin. suprême

6 février 2025

6 février 2025

(the sixth applicant – see paragraph 5 above) was visiting her family.

Source officielle