attaqué (Colmar, 28 juin 1988) d'avoir, à la suite de l'expropriation au profit de l'Etat de terrains lui appartenant, fixé l'indemnité principale de dépossession qui lui est due en l'amputant d'une moins value

The Government subsequently filed additional observations on the applicants’ just satisfaction claim. FACTS A.     Determination of the cadastral value of the real estate in 1997 6.

She also argued that she was unable to submit any valuation of the market price of her property as at the date of expropriation because valuation companies refused to value property which had been demolished

    Various sources give different estimates of the value of duly registered claims.

proposé à des acheteurs non collectionneurs, ainsi que la question de la transparence de ce montage juridique qui, à travers les premières auditions d'investisseurs, n'apparaissait pas avoir été clairement

It emerges from the valuation report produced by the applicant that the full value of the original property amounted to 214,526 Polish zlotys (PLN) as of September 1997.

According to the applicant’s calculations, its value corresponded to 45.4 % of the original property’s value.

It emerges from this decision that the claim had already been partly realised. The full value of the original property amounted to 75,000 Polish zlotys (PLN).

They claim that no other valuation company was willing to make an independent assessment of the market value of their land. 12.

He claims that no other valuation company was willing to make an independent assessment of the market value of his land. 12.

    The Government provided an expert valuation in respect of all the properties concerned, which estimated their market value (including the value of the plot of land, as well as lost profit

There is nothing in the document which would allow the Court to take that valuation into account in determining whether the applicant company’s claim is reasonable.

On 17 December 1992 the authorities informed the applicant that his claim had been entered in the relevant register as claim no. 275.

    They further contested the applicants’ pecuniary claim as excessive and disproportionate to the value of the land in 2001 and its current market value.

public ; Considérant qu'il ressort des pièces du dossier soumis aux juges du fond qu'à la suite d'un contrôle sur pièces, l'administration fiscale a remis en cause le report d'imposition d'une plus-value

Co Valor C Eur 4D, à la date du 31 décembre 2024.

laquelle viennent les époux C..., ont levé l'option le 15 décembre 1998 mais n'ayant pas obtenu de la société SEPI qu'elle signe l'acte de cession, dont, selon celle-ci, les conditions relatives à la valorisation

Caillet, Valdès, Waquet, Renard-Payen, conseillers ; MM. A..., Bonnet, Mmes Y..., Marie, Charruault, conseillers référendaires ; M.

DES DECHETS MENAGERS, - les conclusions de Mme Claire Legras, rapporteur public ; La parole ayant été à nouveau donnée à la SCP Piwnica, Molinié, avocat du SYNDICAT INTERCOMMUNAL DE COLLECTE ET DE VALORISATION