CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 493 résultats pour « Alexandre BECAUD »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC003241308

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2014

7 octobre 2014

    Relying on Article 10 of the Convention, the applicant complained that his employment contract was terminated because of the statements he had made, which were published in a newspaper but

Page 25 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC000444610

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

sitting on 11   October 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0113JUD002895402

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2005

13 janvier 2005

According to the Government, the adjournments took place because the applicant failed to appear. According to the applicant, he came to every hearing, but the defendant never showed up. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD001122810

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2011

28 juin 2011

    On 17 April 2009 the applicant’s defence counsel informed the trial court that the applicant would not be able to attend a hearing scheduled for 20   April 2009 because he was to be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD000913406

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

    On 17 February 2003 the Vienna Tax Office dismissed the applicant’s claim because the children were not resident in Austria, which was one of the main conditions for entitlement to such an

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2591664-7765088

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

Convention on Human Rights on account of failings in the domestic examination of the injuries suffered by the applicant when a smoke-bomb was fired by the security forces during a demonstration and because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD004200910

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

It explained that it had been paying him a reduced salary in that period because before paying him his net salary it had deducted certain amounts and paid them directly to his creditors with a view to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

He did not remember much about the events at issue because of the time that had elapsed since; however, he remembered that the applicant had made no complaints of having been beaten.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC006065908

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

At that time, the applicant became aware of the investigator’s decision of 7   March 2008 refusing to institute criminal proceedings in connection with the incident of 22 February 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0627JUD002251514

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

The Regional Court ignored the arguments of Mr   D’Alessandro and Mr Haussmann on this point. 20 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129DEC001081517

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2018

29 novembre 2018

    As regards application no. 79826/17 the Court notes that the domestic judgment of 24 November 2008, which became final on 12 February 2009, did not include an outstanding obligation in favour

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2818507-3085408

Admin. suprême

26 août 2009

26 août 2009

Contributions to the National Insurance Fund could not be equated to contributions to a private pension scheme, because the money was used, together with money provided from general taxation, to finance

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68295-68763

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

He further complains that the review by the High Court of the Gaming Board’s decision could not adequately remedy the matter because of the restricted nature of judicial review.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1013DEC000914680

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 1986

13 octobre 1986

  He did not give any medical treatment because there was none that could usefully be given.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330DEC006484801

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

I have also been able to do that because I fight for my interests. At school things are now also better.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD000717803

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2008

15 mai 2008

    On 25 October 2001 the public commission was disbanded because the case had gone to trial. G.     Judicial proceedings against Mr B. 51.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD007102113

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

    The hearings scheduled for January and May 2011 were adjourned because of the applicant’s former wife’s absence; she presented doctor’s certificates.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0906JUD001407812

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2018

6 septembre 2018

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Aleš Pejchal,   Krzysztof

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD001557803

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD000496306

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, judges, and

Source officielle