A l'origine de l'affaire se trouve une requête (n o 53997/00) dirigée contre la République portugaise et dont deux ressortissants de cet Etat, M me   Maria do Céu Dias da Silva et M.

The rule that the husband's name became the family name if the spouses did not provide otherwise did not discriminate against women but had regard to the fact that this was the usual choice.

  Marina Vasilyevna Gunkina 14 July 2000 / the Kominternovskiy District Court of Voronezh 3,402.29 14.

Now comes this new idea of a marina at Xemxija.

accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Stjepan Glogović, is a Croatian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Marija

    Did the applicants come within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Moldova and/or the Russian Federation within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention as interpreted by the Court, inter

The court noted that the applicant was not involved in the child custody proceedings in issue, which were of a contentious nature, and did not know A. or F. personally.

mois d'emprisonnement assortie d'un sursis de dix-sept mois et quinze jours ; "aux motifs que Manuel X... est prévenu d'avoir à Bourges et à Sainte Thorette, dans le Cher, de septembre 2000 à mars

The applicants did not appeal against this judgment and consequently it gained legal force.

    Did the applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the trial amount to degrading treatment proscribed by Article 3 of the Convention?

    Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

The Court notes, as it did in Gankin and Others , cited above, that the appeal judgments did not mention any proof of receipt of summonses by the applicants or their representatives and did not contain

Croatia (no. 24810/06) The applicant, Marija Parlov-Tkalčić, is a Croatian national who was born in 1948 and lives in Zlatar (Croatia).

when the tort action had been considered as representing an effective remedy (see, mutatis mutandis , Polgar , § 96 and Vlad , § 23, both cited above; see the appended table for further details), but did

display:inline-block } .sC9D6F765 { width:209.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 45928/08 and 57662/08 Marija

Did the applicants have an arguable right, under domestic law, to seek reimbursement of legal costs paid by their predecessor?

width:19.77pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block } .sAFF36EC2 { width:18.78pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 50546/14 Marija

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#424242 } .sBAADFE8C { border:0.75pt solid #838383; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 12476/21 Maria

RG 24/03330 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7I-CJYN4 Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue le 22 juillet 2024, à 16h36, par le juge des libertés et de la détention du tribunal judiciaire de Bobigny Nous, Maria-Pia