When asked by journalists, she had acknowledged that she had been referring to V.P. and D.Ş and had expressly mentioned that information about the system the two had been using to obtain income had already

T.M. had also told the applicant that he had had another girlfriend who had worked for him and whom he had also beaten.

On 24 February officers from the department had also viewed security camera footage of the location where R. had been dropped by her mother, and had had a conversation with the bus driver.

They had concluded that the Iraqi forces had had full control of the Operation.

She did not provide any evidence to show that the disciplinary proceedings or the manner in which they had been reported in the media had damaged her professional reputation: the publications had reflected

had allegedly presented a flight risk.

had been no violation of Article 5 (right to liberty and security) of the Convention; unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing); unanimously, that there had

In the hearing when the orders had first been made, the applicants had been directly heard in court but had not been legally represented.

Kastriot had told R.B. that his brother had been killed and that he had learned from his policemen friends who had participated in the operation in which his brother had been killed that I.N. had killed

He maintained that he had stayed in the water for about an hour and had gone ashore when the police had left. He had later been captured. 17.

They had admonished Mr I.I. several times to stop, and had used force and a weapon only because Mr I.I. had at first tried to run one of them over, had then tried to push their car off the road, and had

for eight years and had had no contact with him for seven of those years.

The domestic authorities had concluded that the first applicant and her children had never entered Croatian territory and that the police officers had not had any direct contact with them prior to the

However, the Court had to be persuaded that the fact that only part of the relevant facts had been established and only some of those responsible had been sanctioned had not been the result of a clearly

This officer stated that the applicant had refused to be handcuffed and had kept his hands down.

It had been considered that the applicant had thereby aimed to manipulate opinion in favour of FETÖ/PDY and had thus contributed to the coup process, of which he had had prior knowledge.

Earlier proceedings against him had been discontinued or had led to an acquittal.

Earlier proceedings against him had been discontinued or had led to an acquittal.

Although the first applicant’s general situation had improved (she had married and had had a daughter, for whom she seemed able to care), it was held that she was not sufficiently capable of seeing or