It will therefore confine its examination to the question of whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16   December 1992, §§ 33-34, Series A no. 247

Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by seven Bulgarian nationals, Ms Madlen Magardich Chengelyan, Ms Viktoria Takvor Chengelyan, Mr Eduard

applicable at the date of settlement; (c)   that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Kateřina Šimáčková , judges , and Viktoriya

capitale pour maintenir la confiance du public et son adhésion à l’Etat de droit et pour prévenir toute apparence de tolérance d’actes illégaux ou de collusion dans leur perpétration ( Paul et Audrey Edwards

the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal

Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 147, ECHR 2004 ‑ XII; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, § 97, ECHR 2002 ‑ II; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95

43425/98) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Edward

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Paul Mercieca, Andrew Manduca, Raphael Aloisio, Steve Cachia, Stephen Paris, Malcolm Booker and Edward

appropriate for the purposes of Article   35§   1 to take the start of the six-month period as the date on which the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Edwards

principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul   and   Audrey Edwards

The Court's task under the Convention is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, among other authorities, Edwards v.

    In deciding whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant were fair, the Court will examine them as a whole (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A

The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, Series A no.

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to take the start of the six-month period from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

alleged unlawfulness or negligence by public authorities (see, for example, Hugh   Jordan v. the United Kingdom , no. 24746/94, §§ 162-63, ECHR 2001 ‑ III (extracts) and Paul and Audrey Edwards