The Government denied the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment and considered them unsubstantiated, referring to the findings of the inquiry conducted by the prosecutor in response to

However, they denied any involvement by State agents in the alleged killing of her son and the alleged disappearance of her husband. B.     Official investigation into the events 15 .

Thus, it decides to join this objection to the merits of the case and considers that the issue falls to be examined below. II.   ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 87.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that he had contracted HIV and tuberculosis in custody, that he had been denied adequate medical assistance, that he had had no effective remedy in respect

by the notion of a “fair balance” that must be struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual’s fundamental rights (see Edwards

For this reason it considers it appropriate to examine the applicant’s complaint under the two provisions taken together (see Edwards v.

This time he denied hitting Mr Gerasimov and said that he had seen someone else hit him in the scuffle. 26.

    The US Government had denied that the applicant was an informant and, while he may have had contact with law enforcement agencies, the District Judge did not consider that he had done so

The rule also affords the prospective applicant time to consider whether to lodge an application and, if so, to decide on the specific complaints and arguments to be raised (see, for example, Worm v.

    The Court thus considers that the questions to decide in the present case are, firstly, whether the applicant’s son was tortured by the prison guards, which resulted in his death, as the

By a letter of 7 March 2024, Mr Ramaj’s representative informed the Court that the applicant’s son, who was also one of his three heirs, Mr Eduart Ramaj, wished to continue the proceedings in his stead

Major I. denied all the accusations. 20.

       -   the hearing held on 14 January 1991;           Having deliberated,           Decides

    On 23 October 2008 I.P., a well-known Croatian journalist, and his business associate N.F. were killed by the explosion of an improvised device placed under I.P.’s car, which was parked in

the facts and, where appropriate, the identification and punishment of those responsible, where those responsible are State agents, but also where they are private individuals (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

Ambler- Edwards , Ministry of Defence,     Mr D.

1870 of the previous century, which in turn reflected earlier rules of law relating to the forfeiture of certain rights by a convicted “felon” (the so-called “civic death” of the times of King   Edward

    The Government denied that any ill-treatment had been inflicted on the applicant. 22.

According to the Government, he had denied any complicity in the murder.