SCHAFFRERIE, - LA SOCIETE SOFIFA, - LA SOCIETE SOMALEAD, - LA SOCIETE MARSEILLAISE DES SOLS PLASTIQUES (SOMASOL), - LA SOCIETE SOMEICO, - LA SOCIETE BULENT, - LA SOCIETE DU CHEMIN DE FER DE DAMAS

  6969/19, the applicant company also complained about the inability to obtain damages for loss of profit due to the impossibility to build on its land.

    The applicants claimed 40,793 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage representing the value of the property in question and EUR   5,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damages caused

    Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations (The Home Office Guidelines of 1984) provided that only chief constables or assistant chief constables were entitled to

          In December 1979 the applicants applied for financial compensation in respect of the damages allegedly caused to them by the fact that they had received

    Damage 39.     The applicant claimed 300,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

    Damage 39.

    Damage 37.     The applicant claimed 1,779,390 German marks (DM) in respect of pecuniary damage, equivalent to the value of the seized agricultural equipment.

    The State and Municipalities Responsibility for Damage Act 14.

    Damage 53.

    The applicant submitted that a finding of a violation of the Convention would constitute sufficient redress for his non-pecuniary damage; the Court accepted that position.

attached weight to the applicants’ argument that the family relations made possible by the mother’s moderation after her return to Germany would have been out of the question at the time when the constant

Janvier 2025 Président : Madame Christine ZARB, Vice-Présidente Greffier : Madame Anaïs ALI, Greffier Débats en audience publique le : 10 Octobre 2024 GROSSE : Le 09 Janvier 2025 à Me Sylvain DAMAZ

  On 2 November 1981 the Regional Court ordered the carrier to compensate the material damage and dismissed the remainder of claims.

to ordinary legal remedies appropriate for preventing damage.”

He sought 500,000 roubles ((RUR), approximately 20,000 euros (EUR)) in compensation for non-pecuniary damage. 11.

    Damage 65.     The applicant claimed 70,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 66.     The Government contested these claims.

  Under Article 41 of the Convention (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant 5   000   euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 7   000 for costs and expenses.

In civil proceedings, the applicants were awarded approximately EUR 7,000 in compensation for non-pecuniary damage.