C A, représentée par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : 1°) de lui accorder le bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 13 juillet 2022 par lequel la préfète du Bas-Rhin

C..., représentés par Me Bohner, demandent au juge des référés, saisi sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d’admettre M. A...

Savchenko   Moscow   08/03/2016 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article   19.3 § 1 of CAO fines of RUB   15,000 and RUB   1,000 Moscow City Court 18/11/2016 (both decisions on the same

#Article 267 TFEU — National constitution — Interlocutory procedure for the mandatory review of constitutionality — Assessment as to whether a national law is consistent both with EU law and with national

Kingdom of the Netherlands lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Somali national, Mrs Sahra Said Botan

  ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION Allegation of violation by reason of non-disclosure to both applicants of documents submitted in care proceedings. A.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of both sets of proceedings, alleging that they were to be examined as a single set of proceedings.

Criminal investigations were immediately opened by both the Cypriot authorities and by the Turkish (including the “TRNC”) authorities.

In 2000 the applicant lodged an action before the Izmir Cadastral Court, claiming the registration of both plots in its name in the land register.

The issue of overcrowding also came before the domestic authorities giving rise to a series of landmark judgments by both the Supreme and Constitutional Courts and to legislative reform.

  Both applicants alleged breaches of Article   2 of Protocol №   7 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) due to impossibility to appeal to a higher court a judgment imposing

The issue of overcrowding also came before the domestic authorities giving rise to a series of landmark judgments by both the Supreme and Constitutional Courts and to legislative reform.

Both parties appealed. On 18 April 2005 the Court of Cassation quashed the judgment on procedural grounds.

On the same day, the first and the second applicants were both transferred to the Pest Central District Court where, after a brief hearing, they were both placed under house arrest until 21 January 2013

    On 9 December 2007 both applicants went to a football match in Munich. 4.

B..., représentée par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l’admettre au bénéfice de l’aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 20 juin 2025 par lequel le préfet du Bas-Rhin

Gros ; - les observations de Me Bohner, représentant Mme D C, présente à l'audience. Le préfet du Bas-Rhin, régulièrement convoqué, n'était ni présent ni représenté.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 22 juin 2023, Mme A D, représentée par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire