The applicants’ appeal was rejected on 5 September 2013 by Oppland and Hedmark County Social Affairs Board ( fylkesnemnda for barnevern og sosiale saker , henceforth “the Board”).

He observed that there was nothing in the file concerning the declaration of euthanasia submitted to the Board, or the Board’s assessment. 47 .

By asking for the Board’s observations on the opinions of the foreign experts, the Board is in reality being asked to comment on its own conclusions.

Neither this certificate nor the applicant’s health problems has been assessed during the National Immigration Board’s and the Aliens Appeals Board’s examination of his original application.

On 6 September 2001 the Migration Board rejected the request and, on 2 April 2002, the Aliens Appeals Board upheld the Migration Board’s decision in full and ordered the applicants to leave Sweden within

Sur le pourvoi n° V 95-43.086 formé par la société JF Boccard, société anonyme, dont le siège est ..., II. Sur le pourvoi n° R 95-43.703 formé par M.

The applicant appealed against the decision to the National Labour Market Board (Arbetsmarknadsstyrelsen) , which upheld it by decision of 2   June 2005.

had with a fellow classmate and an attempted suicide event dating back ten years which, the applicant claims should have been treated as confidential medical data and not available to the interview board

enregistrées par les tachygraphes, domaine qu'il pratique depuis 38 ans au sein de sa société dont l'activité est la réparation, la conception et la distribution au niveau national de l'instrumentation de bord

The applicants lodged an appeal with the Provincial Land Reform Board (Landesagrarsenat - "the Provincial Board").

On 30 July 1992, the Parole Board again declined to recommend the applicant's release.

  At the end of the hearing the Rent Board announced that the decision in the case would be made available at the Rent Board's registry on 1 December 1983.   24.

The appellate board joined the Migration Board's view that the alleged risks to the applicants had been exaggerated.

  An owner of land affected by a County Administrative Board decision approving a building plan has a right of appeal against the Board's decision to the Government.   36.

claim for the dismissal of the members of that Board.

Parole Board, ex parte Bradley (Divisional Court) [1991] 1 WLR 135; R. v. Parole Board ex parte Wilson (Court of Appeal) [1992] 2 AER 576). In R. v.

In fact, it belonged to the Electricity Board where the applicant had been an employee.

   On 26 May she went to the Invalidity Insurance Board’s headquarters to inspect her medical file, which had been sent there by the Appeals Board, but she was not allowed to see it.

    Further, the Board reiterated that when the decision to place X in public care had been adopted, the Board had considered that the problems had primarily been at the level of emotional care