SCCV LES HELIADES, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 2] représentée par Maître Alexandre BECAUD, avocat au barreau de LYON Débats tenus à l'audience du 28 Janvier 2025 - Délibéré au 15 Avril

    The applicants claimed that they should have been awarded compensation for unlawful prosecution because they had not been found guilty by any court. 15.

He was beaten up by cellmates because of his alleged collaboration with the prison administration.

He had been hospitalised on 1   April 2000 because he had attempted to commit suicide.

Because at the relevant time he lacked identity documents, he could not prove his citizenship. 6 .

Lord Justice Clarke considered that the District Judge and the Recorder had failed to apply the relevant legal principles correctly, and that permission to appeal should be granted, because otherwise no

The court noted that the applicants still had the right to restoration of G.O.’s land because their agreement had been lawful, and that they were on the list of candidates to be given new plots of land

The preparatory hearing scheduled for 15   September 2004 was adjourned because neither party appeared in court.

The court stated that, according to the police officers, the applicant had been totally aware of the situation, because he had been changing his version of the events, and that his statements had been

THE LAW The applicants complain under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that, because they were men, they were not entitled to the equivalent of widow’s benefits.

The expert examination was never performed because V. refused to show N. to the experts.

He wrote to the Benefits Agency again on 8 May 2000 and was rejected on 15 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

The applicant's lawyer did not object because he stated that he had other court commitments. 27.

Recht om het beroep van kleuterleider uit te oefenen – Gereglementeerd beroep – Recht van toegang tot het beroep op basis van een in de lidstaat van oorsprong afgegeven diploma – In een derde land behaalde

The court rejected the applicant’s request for legal aid at this stage of the proceedings, because “the domestic law did not provide for the right to free legal representation before appeal courts”.

France judgment that, where an appeal on points of law was declared inadmissible solely because the appellant had not surrendered to custody pursuant to the judicial decision challenged in the appeal,

However, because the applicant did not have a lawyer, the court would not proceed with the case and she was taken back to the police station, where she handed over her passport.

On 15 June 2004 the court refused to accept the action, because the applicants had not complained to a non ‑ judicial institution first, as was obligatory.

He also pointed to testimonies by witnesses in the case which had confirmed that the applicant had been verbally and physically assaulted and threatened by some of his colleagues because of the messages