The notes made by the witness are enclosed in the case file. The witness stated that these notes were a word play, that is to say, he had mixed up letters in the words.

Certain procedures lasted several years, and some are still pending before the domestic courts. B.

It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 4.

avant » pour un montant de 22 771,56 euros, « fourniture et pose de revêtement polyurethane UCRETE DP 20 » pour deux montants de 8 766,50 euros, « remise en étanchéité des chéneaux façade avant et arrière

    The applicants are two hundred and thirty-seven individual shareholders in two savings banks, Kinizsi Bank Zrt. (“Kinizsi Bank”) and Mohácsi Takarék Bank Zrt. (“Mohácsi Bank”).

a public interest, and are proportionate.

It is alleged that these conditions are not being looked after properly. THE LAW 1.

  They are faced with a situation which is in part the result oftheir own success.

The defendants are correct in their assertion that the gravity of the offence in itself does not suffice to conclude that there are particularly serious circumstances which make detention necessary.

The qualified corpi delicti are envisaged in the event of grave consequences and other circumstances.

But there are certain essentials which we would highlight: 1.

The proceedings before the Constitutional Court are still pending. 5.

The defendants are correct in their assertion that the gravity of the offence in itself could not suffice to conclude that there are especially grave circumstances which make detention necessary.

They are not required to renew that oath before each assignment.”

The applicant’s alleged alibi was unsubstantiated.

Therefore, the question arises of whether the applicant lost his status as a victim of a breach of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention.

Nor had the court verified the applicant’s alibi.

However, persons certainly are being held there, on occasion for very lengthy periods of time.

It considers that there are no reasons for it to depart from that finding in the circumstances of the present case. 44.     The applicant did in fact avail himself of this remedy.