CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417DEC005300408
17 avril 2012
April 2012 as a Chamber composed of: Anatoly Kovler, President, Nina Vajić, Elisabeth Steiner, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
Page 24 sur 75
Chambre Sociale-Section 1
69d74051cdc6046d479bdd95
8 avril 2026
Greffier : Monsieur Alexandre VAZZANA, lors des débats et Madame Anaïs TAMBARO, lors du prononcé ARRÊT : Contradictoire Prononcé publiquement par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD003019409
21 juin 2011
His detention was arbitrary and unlawful because he had not been suspected of any offence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD006747411
18 avril 2013
He would not be persecuted on political grounds, or because of his race, religion, nationality or political views.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD002161307
3 octobre 2013
The demonstration became known as the March of Dissenters; it was organised by three individuals, none of whom are applicants in the present case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD000055210
He also claimed that he had been unfairly dismissed and that his dismissal was invalid because he had not been paid sufficient compensation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD003941707
27 septembre 2011
In that letter the applicant stated that after his release he had been living with his family in the Krasnodar Region; he had to be discreet because he did not want to be arrested and because the order
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1030JUD000575309
30 octobre 2014
In particular, they contended that they had accepted the money only because the police had incited them to do so, and they would not have done it under any other circumstances. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD007506812
24 juillet 2014
Another hearing was scheduled for 4 March 2010, but was adjourned because the case file was at the Supreme Court. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108JUD005419107
8 novembre 2011
The preliminary investigation had lasted for ten years and had then been discontinued because the statutory limitation period had expired.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD000308407
18 septembre 2012
She had survived her escape on a container ship, during which she ‘nearly went mad’ because in mid-ocean she ‘no longer knew whether it was night or day outside’.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC006219300
26 février 2008
The five individual applicants, Mr Boris Petkov Borisov, Mr Georgi Alexandrov Kirilov, Ms Iskra Borisova Mladenova, Mr Tassi Tsenov Tassev and Mr Petko Borisov Traikov are Bulgarian nationals who lived
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-891502-916128
18 décembre 2003
Greece (applications nos. 63000/00, 74291/01 and 74292/01) The applicant, Alexandros Skondrianos, is a Greek national.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630DEC001014913
30 juin 2020
The first-instance decision of 24 May 2004 (see paragraph 11 above) thus became final ( pravomoćno ). 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD001300613
18 septembre 2014
She stated that she had been paying all her bills and that ‘I previously had a huge negative [balance], [because] I had to pay for the hospital’.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC002649409
24 janvier 2012
2012 as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Corneliu Bîrsan, Alvina Gyulumyan, Egbert Myjer, Ineta Ziemele, Luis López Guerra, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0407JUD001827508
7 avril 2016
This decision became final from the moment of its pronouncement and was not subject to appeal. 15.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD001878611
2 mai 2013
Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Elisabeth Steiner, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925DEC000447106
25 septembre 2012
xa0; September 2012 as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Peer Lorenzen, Elisabeth Steiner, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD003115407
21 mai 2015
On 23 April 1998 the Skopje Court of Appeal quashed that judgment and remitted the case for fresh consideration because of substantial procedural flaws. 9.