Both applicants stated that they would appoint lawyers at a later stage and that they would then answer the questions relating to their membership of the outlawed organisations.

des jardins (avec la réserve des jardins potagers domestiques ou des jardins « ouvriers ») et des espaces verts publics et privés, ainsi que l'arrosage des espaces sportifs de toute nature dont les stades

On 12, 19 and 23 March, 30 May and 1 June 2006 the applicant made various statements and gave interviews to the press.

It was noted that the applicant’s state of health was of “medium seriousness”.

G. gave the following statements: “... Question (Q): Want to go home? Answer (A): No Q: Where do the injuries come from? A: Fell of the stairs Q: How did you fall? Did you slip?

On both occasions they repeated the content of their statements of 10   February 1996. They never mentioned that their statements had been obtained under torture.

sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative : 1°) à titre principal, d'enjoindre à la garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice, en premier lieu, d'autoriser son entrée en stage

comprend et d'une manière détaillée, de la nature et de la cause de l'accusation portée contre lui ; que le prévenu n'a pu connaître l'identité des personnes qui se livraient à la prostitution qu'à un stade

  It places upon the State the obligation to ensure that these organs of public opinion shall not be used to undermine public order or public morality or the authority of the State.

depuis un temps au moins égal à la moitié de la durée normale du stage ».

On 28 September 1994 his statement was taken by the police.

, the police or a State Attorney who is not competent to deal with the matter, they shall forward the criminal complaint to the competent State Attorney.” 57.

The Guidelines state as follows. 28.

    On the same day the public prosecutor filed a bill of indictment with the Diyarbakır State Security Court, accusing the applicant of membership of an illegal organisation.

    The respondent Government considered that the range of preliminary issues that the Court could examine at the admissibility stage of an inter-State case was not limited to those mentioned

The applicant alleged that he was a member of the organisation “Group 24” opposing to the current Government of Tajikistan.

pourvoi ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 105 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale, 133 du décret du 20 mai 1903 portant règlement sur l'organisation

" étant plus spécialement "chargé d'exporter les fonds pour payer la marchandise en provenance du continent" ; que le jugement définitif d'acquittement du tribunal britannique et ses annexes les "statements

She also stated that she had been helped to escape by a non-profit organisation, which had offered her a safe place to stay until her return to Romania. 5.