It thus considers that the applicant’s remaining complaints are admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

It thus finds that there is no need to give a separate ruling on them (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no.

THE LAW The Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by the above complaints.

THE LAW After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints

the applicant’s complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicant and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

THE LAW After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints

    The Government did not make any specific submissions. 37.

Later on the same date, at the police station they subjected him to further beatings to make him confess to a sexual assault.

The second applicant made an objection to Judge S. who, according to him, had already expressed his position in the judgment against the editorial board.

Valentini, a lawyer practising in Rome; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Consequently, the Court does not consider it appropriate to make any award in respect of pecuniary loss. 39.

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 8.

The Court reiterates its constant approach that in the absence of a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings a party’s disagreement with the assessment made by the first-instance and appeal courts

In examining the fairness of criminal proceedings, the Court has also held, in particular, that by ignoring a specific, pertinent and important point made by the accused, domestic courts fall short of

interest in having the late victim exonerated of any finding of guilt or in protecting their own reputation and that of their family ( ibid., § 71; see also Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

    Grounds for [an appeal] made in the light of exceptional circumstances “1.

According to the applicant, he was forced to make such a statement by the head of the police station.