In this regard, they submitted that the applicant had so far served less than ten years of his sentence, which was much less than the statutory minimum period to be served of a life sentence before becoming

There is no indication that grossly unfair or arbitrary conclusions were drawn from the evidence. The proceedings as a whole were fair, including the way in which evidence was taken. B.

The applicant asserted that, nevertheless, the statement of the police officers had carried more weight in the District Court’s eyes than that of the applicant’s family members. II.

They claimed that the existing law was unnecessary and that it created hardship and distress for a substantial minority of persons affected by it.

THAI IN BOX 4 ...

  The applicants complain that they had not been able to withdraw the money from those accounts.

Likewise, they did not provide any evidence that there existed relevant domestic practice on the subject. 31.

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non ‑ exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one, available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that

They confirmed, in almost verbatim statements, that they had travelled on mission to Astrakhan to return Mr   Saidakhmadov to Grozny.

In its report of 1 July 1997 (Article 31), it expressed the opinion that there had been a violation of that provision (twenty-four votes to eight).

They further submitted that that an automatic periodic review was available under Articles 108 and 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and that a prosecutor was entitled, pursuant to Article 110, to

She also complained that the Constitutional Court had deprived her of access to that court.

Those provisions, to the extent that they were relevant to the case, read as follows: Section 302 “1.

The Court of Appeal found that, while general legal rules did not allow private documents to be produced by a third party, case-law and legal theory admitted of an exception in divorce proceedings including

    The applicant submitted that he had not made use of any domestic remedies, because, according to his knowledge, there were no effective remedies available in his case.

The applicant states that he lived and slept in cells of less than 20 square metres where from 10 to 15 inmates were held. There was an open toilet in each cell.

They conceded that his detention from 15 to 29 July 2010 had indeed been groundless.

  Its existence as a theory allows that it is at least arguable that transsexuals are born with the conflict that then becomes more apparent as they become more and more conscious of their own sex

This meant that there were not enough votes to lift his immunity. 12 .