The next hearing was held on 4 November 1997. 32.

Elle n'aboutissait véritablement qu'après le 12 février 2007, date à laquelle le différend s'aggravait par suite de l'initiative que prenait Helder X... de faire usage d'une arme à feu contre Hassan Z.

It accordingly held that there had been no violation of Article 9 of the Convention.

It therefore held that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1.

Mr Fedorov was Head Veterinarian of the Kargasok District.

  m, in which thirty-two inmates were held at the same time. According to Mr   Savelyev, he was also held in cells measuring 15 and 19   sq.

Accordingly, it held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

    From 17 August 2002 to 2 April 2003 the applicant had been held in remand centre IZ-77/2 in Moscow. 14.

From that date until 17 July 2002, the court held a total of fifteen hearings. At the hearing held on that last date, the Land Registry Court dismissed the applicants’ request. 20.

He also stated that he had punched and kicked the applicant’s body and head, and that as a result the applicant had fallen down and hit his head on an aquarium.

The rapporteur held investigatory sittings between 30 September 2002 and 23 December 2002.

It therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 2.   The Court further held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 13.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been:   a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of Mr Stefanov’s death; a violation of Article

the second applicant; (iv)   held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 3 of the Convention as regards the first applicant; (v)   held, by six votes to one, that there had

Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 on those two points.

The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4 and awarded the applicant 60,000 Slovak korunas (SKK) for non-pecuniary damage and SKK 2,000 for costs

He was held in that cell until 1   June   2018, except for a two-month period in 2011 during which he was held in cell no.   78. 7 .

Ruling on an equitable basis, the Court awards a total sum of EUR 2,600 under that head to be paid jointly to the applicant’s successors. B.     Costs and expenses 30.

Any award under this head should therefore not exceed a total amount of EUR 3,000. 35.

    Mandate is given to the Head of the Immigration and Naturalisation Service of the Ministry of Justice and to the Deputy Head of the Immigration and Naturalisation Service to take and sign