The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that her right to a fair trial in general, and her right of access to court was hindered as a result of the domestic courts’ inability to grant

Arrest van het Hof (Tiende kamer) van 22 januari 2020.#AT tegen Pensionsversicherungsanstalt.#Verzoek van het Oberste Gerichtshof om een prejudiciële beslissing.

Arrest van het Gerecht (Eerste kamer) van 17 februari 2017.#Novar GmbH tegen Bureau voor intellectuele eigendom van de Europese Unie.

Vedat Günaydın added that he had suffered head injuries during the scuffle and had been forcefully pushed about by the police at the time of his arrest.

Secondly, where a person had ceased to be head of State he no longer enjoyed to the full extent the immunity from jurisdiction formerly accorded under international law by other States.

The applicant claimed that he had attended all five hearings. 16.

At approximately 4.30 a.m. he was taken in handcuffs and with his head covered by a bag to the rear of Ömer Bayram’s house.

X... et Heder, après leur licenciement pour motif économique décidé le 30 août 1982 par la société Bidault, ont attrait cette dernière devant la juridiction prud'homale afin d'obtenir paiement de diverses

administrative, de suspendre l'exécution de l'arrêté du 8 juin 2023 par lequel la directrice générale de l'Agence régionale de santé (ARS) Guyane a placé l'institut médico-éducatif départemental (IMED) Léopold Héder

On 8 August 1995 a further hearing was held. On 7   September   1995 the court requested the expert to supplement his opinion which he did on 23   October 1995.

In so deciding it held as follows: “Therefore, a constitutional complaint cannot be based on either of the constitutional provisions stated [by the complainant in her constitutional complaint].

Before the Cracow District Court, the applicant stated that he did not know why he was being detained. 23.

that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention;   -   held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the

In a judgment of 15 December 2015 a Chamber of the Court held, by five votes to two, that there had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention, under its substantive head, and unanimously

On 30   September 2015 he held a hearing and pronounced a verdict, but did not issue a written version of the verdict. On 16 February 2016 Judge Ch. was dismissed by a Presidential order.

One of the applicants went on a 115-day hunger strike while being held in pre-trial detention.

  Appeals Division of the Patent Office Not necessary to rule on various complaints submitted under this head, having regard to Court's conclusion as to applicant company's possible access to ordinary

The Court accordingly held that there had been no violation of Article 6 under that head.

    Following the intervention of the army, the first applicant was injured in the head, on the arms and legs after being hit with a hard object.