CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD001037508
10 octobre 2017
It relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which provides, insofar as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing
Page 23 sur 1853
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD005288808
11 décembre 2012
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11184
30 août 2016
on the Court’s case-law 199 August-September 2016 Igor Pascari v. the Republic of Moldova - 25555/10 Judgment 30.8.2016 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Criminal charge Fair hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0123JUD004289514
23 janvier 2020
At a public hearing held on 4 October 2013, the Skopje Court of Appeal ( Апелационен суд Скопје – “the Court of Appeal”) overturned the first-instance judgment and dismissed the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1125JUD005126907
25 novembre 2014
The right to a public hearing 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD004993708
16 février 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD004436314
4 juin 2020
The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD000443607
3 juillet 2014
As to the second report, it was not adduced as evidence until 3 April 2006, the day of the hearing, at the end of which the first-instance court gave judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD007623611
11 juin 2020
The first-instance court therefore appointed a State-funded lawyer as his counsel and continued the hearing. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003131208
26 mars 2013
The applicants maintained that their right to a fair hearing by a tribunal had been breached.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD004525214
20 juin 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD001100804
8 octobre 2019
The public had been excluded from the trial court hearings for unclear reasons. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1215JUD006075015
15 décembre 2020
The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ failure to ensure that the applicants
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0926JUD006227116
26 septembre 2024
In the minutes of the hearing it was indicated that despite being duly notified, the applicant had not requested to participate in the hearing. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD007130416
31 août 2023
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0726JUD002749406
26 juillet 2022
As regards the judicial review proceedings, the Government noted that it was open to the applicant to request a hearing in camera and that the recordings had not been played at the hearing, only a transcript
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD005372915
17 juin 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD004948113
24 avril 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD003647008
14 janvier 2014
The High Court of Cassation and Justice held two hearings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD005316610
21 décembre 2021
According to the record of the relevant hearing, the District Court examined the application submitted by the NSS from 9.20 a.m. to 9.40 a.m. 19 .