CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD003954311
1 octobre 2019
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
Page 23 sur 2688
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417JUD004897910
17 avril 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0507JUD002389112
7 mai 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0507JUD006413811
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD003904711
25 septembre 2018
of expression and freedom of assembly. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD007405411
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD006437512
The applicant complained under Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention that her conviction had constituted a breach of her rights to freedom of thought and to freedom of expression. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD001722113
2 octobre 2018
Article 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation guarantees freedom of thought and expression, and freedom of the media. 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD004183909
9 octobre 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD007010711
19 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD000375211
10 juillet 2018
and freedom of assembly.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD003709111
3713 had constituted a breach of their right to freedom of expression. Article 10 of the Convention reads as follows: “1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD006465911
19 juillet 2018
Accordingly, the statement lost the attributes of the freedom (of thought and public expression of thought) and (represents) an abuse of (that freedom).” 4. Other information 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002989907
4 septembre 2018
punishment imposed on them for using the honorific “sayın” (esteemed) when referring to the imprisoned leader of the PKK in their letters, had constituted an unjustified interference with their right to freedom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD004232010
5 septembre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD006060708
7 septembre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD005093006
10 octobre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD007958412
8 février 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD005706909
13 février 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD000108510
27 février 2018
The applicant alleged that his second dismissal from his employment, after the Court had found a violation of his freedom of expression, constituted a violation of his freedom of expression