Moreover, a meeting between the applicant, the family home and the Social Council, scheduled for October 2013, was cancelled upon request by both the applicant and the family home, as they had already

breach her family rights. 15 .

The court did not examine the applicant’s allegation that his exclusion would have a disruptive effect on his family life. 12 .

When the assessment began the applicant was living alone at the family home.

The applicant’s appeals against the removal, in which she stressed disproportionality of the sanction and its disruptive effect on her family life, were to no avail.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke, President,   Faris Vehabović,   Pere Pastor Vilanova , judges

The applicants’ family lived in Perm. 2.

In 2003 the family came to the attention of social services as a result of an “alcohol fuelled” incident between the parents.

The applicant’s allegation of the refusal’s disruptive effect on his personal and family life were left unexamined.

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for family life)

    The relevant part of the Russian Family Code of 1995 provides as follows: Article 73: Restriction of Parental Rights “1.

for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award

    The family lived at the applicant’s flat, where A. had his registered residence.

relative à des pratiques mises en oeuvre dans le secteur des farines alimentaires

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

In all the applications, the family members abroad in respect of whom family reunification had been requested had never been to Switzerland and had no ties to the country, except to their family members

    The applicants subsequently sought to bring members of their nuclear family to Switzerland for the purposes of family reunification.

agency to continue to work as a prostitute: no violation Facts : As part of a scheme designed to enable her to give up prostitution, the applicant applied to the Paris social-security and family-allowance

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)