The report also indicated the applicant’s need for constant assistance in his everyday activities. 38 .

It ordered the first applicant to pay 25,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) in non-pecuniary damage to Mr Bratholm (the latter’s claim for non-pecuniary damage against the second applicant had been submitted out

    In 1994 the applicant commenced proceedings in the High Court against the Home Office in respect of the psychological damage she had suffered, alleging negligence on the part of the prison

The Government accept that the award of damages against the applicant interfered with its right to freedom of expression.

that they had presented their claim for damages in the criminal proceedings or that they had instituted separate civil proceedings claiming damages (see a contrario Calvelli and Ciglio v.

    Damage 43.

It ordered the first applicant to pay 25,000 Norwegian kroner (NOK) in non-pecuniary damage to Mr Bratholm (the latter’s claim for non-pecuniary damage against the second applicant had been submitted out

The first four applicants live in Lisbon and the last two in Constância (Portugal).

damage was caused liable to make reparation for it.”

Il considéra que les séquelles constatées ne mettaient pas en danger la vie de la requérante et ordonna un arrêt de travail de sept jours. 13.

Elle est portée à la connaissance de la personne de confiance désignée par le patient ou, à défaut, de la famille ou des proches. / () ".

and the port of Constanţa.

In addition, claims for damages in accordance with the provisions relating to unlawful acts shall not be excluded.”

    Damage 40.     The applicant requested an overall amount of EUR 1,331,934 for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

On 28 December 2000 Pamir-99 sued Technopribor for damages incurred through its failure to comply with the judgment. 2.

The certificate stated that the child (born in 1989) suffered from mild intellectual disability and that he was in need of his parent’s constant care. 9.

The certificate stated that the child (born in 1994) suffered from chronic asthma and that she was in need of her parent’s constant care. 10.

    Pecuniary damage 25.

Chief Constable of Northumbria [1997] Q.B. 464); or has their property targeted in the course of police operations ( Rigby v. Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All.