The applicant did not attend the interview because he feared his replies could be used as evidence against him in the trial, and as he had allegedly not obtained satisfactory guarantees from the investigators

COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings were unfair because the Transdniestrian courts were not “tribunals established by law”, the judges were not impartial

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 and under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the proceedings were unfair, because it had not been aware of the proceedings before the

In those proceedings they were appointed and represented by a guardian ad litem because their address was allegedly unknown.

He also complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings were not fair because, inter alia , the courts did not give sufficient reasons in their judgments, the principle of equality

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings against him were unfair and violated his right to equality of arms because the last-instance court overturned his acquittal

The applicant states that he has not been given access to adequate dental treatment and assistance because there is no dentist and dental equipment in the prison.

Board ( Commissie van Toezicht ) of the Rotterdam prison, location “De Schie”, dismissed the applicant’s complaint that the strip search had violated his rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention because

The prosecutor dismissed his request replying that the (one month) time-limit expired because the judgment was registered later than two months after its delivery.

The applicant claimed that she could not leave for Eritrea, because she did not want to complete the mandatory national service, in which women are subjected to inhuman treatment, and because as a single

The applicant lodged a claim regarding the length of proceedings because those proceedings had lasted for eight years and asked for compensation.

B D, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : - de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle à titre provisoire ; - d'enjoindre au préfet du Rhône d'assurer son relogement dans un délai

A..., représentés par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision implicite par laquelle la commission de recours contre les décisions de refus de visa d'entrée en France a rejeté le

A..., représentée par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision par laquelle la préfète du Rhône a implicitement rejeté sa demande de délivrance d’un premier titre de séjour ; 2

C B, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : - de l'admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle à titre provisoire ; - d'enjoindre au préfet du Rhône d'assurer son relogement dans un délai

against Ukraine lodged on 1 July 2013 communicated on 23 March 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s complaint that he missed the time-limit for lodging his appeal because

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE ET DES PRODUCTIONS, QU'A LA SUITE D'UNE COLLISION SURVENUE ENTRE SA VOITURE AUTOMOBILE ET CELLE DE BERCHARD, LACRAMPE A DEMANDE A CE DERNIER

  Because of his intoxication he was transferred to a medical clinic in Munich.

  This, because the Supreme Court did quash the decision of the President because he had insufficiently motivated why he had not heard the person concerned.