She had sent them money by using money transfer services or through third parties. After some time she had told them that she no longer wished to work for them. 16.

She alleged that the absence of the applicant and Ms V. without good cause had led to delays in the proceedings.

As regards the third applicant, they stated that she had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies since she had not used the length remedy in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic

She relied on section 180 of the Obligations Act, which provided that the State was liable for damage resulting from “acts of violence or terrorist acts”.

She confined herself to complaining that the requirements laid down in the law for obtaining Italian nationality are too strict and that the procedure would be burdensome and lengthy.

She claims to have hit C only once, when the girl was being really bad. She regards herself ‘as a victim too’ (defence lawyer M.B.).

Upon arrival at the police station, she had been escorted to the office of Lieutenant A.Zh. She had refused to answer his questions and had asked for permission to use a lavatory.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 53626/16 Jacek BILEWICZ against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 30   May   2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

Lastly, she argued, with reference to the Court’s practice, that she had not been obliged to pursue civil remedies. B.     The Court’s assessment 60.

On 9   August 2002 she was granted victim status in the case. 37.

She largely confirmed her earlier testimony.

She contended that she had not had an opportunity to participate in the proceedings, that no measurements of noise and other emissions had ever been taken in her flat, and that the house had not been equipped

She also submitted that since payments had been rare and irregular she had not been able to keep the record and thus suggested to obtain payment slips from the debtor in order to determine how much of

She stated that on 20   June 2004 she had agreed to meet with her friend Mr V. While waiting for him, she was drinking coffee and chatting with her friends, Ms V. and Ms Kar.

She also informed the court that she had appealed against the decision which had transferred the case from the Leoben District Court to the Wiener Neustadt District Court.

Allegedly, she learnt about the secret surveillance measures in January 2002 when she was studying the case file before her trial (see paragraph 36 below). 15.

She had tried to call her after lunch, but there had been no answer.

She was born and grew up in Schwarzenberg (Austria), but moved to Germany when she married.

She also explained that she had ended up in hospital after having been severely beaten by A.N. 11.