judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide

respondent State to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 28 July 1999, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

of the measures taken following its decisions of 28 January 1997 and 19   March   1996, having regard to Italy’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 2 August 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 19 February 2002, having regard to France’s obligation under Article   46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 14 May 2002, having regard to Cyprus’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

respondent State to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 21 March 2000, having regard to France's obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

terms of the friendly settlement, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant the sum provided in the friendly settlement and that no other measure was required in the present case to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 June 1999 and 3 December 1999, having regard to France’s obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 19 March 2002, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 February 1996 and 22 March 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

respondent State to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 21 March 2000, having regard to Cyprus’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 9 February 1996 and 22 March 1996, having regard to Italy's obligation under Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

to inform it of the measures taken following its decisions of 15 July and 3 December 1999, having regard to Italy’s obligation under former Article   32, paragraph   4, of the Convention to abide

invited the Government of the Netherlands to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment, having regard to its obligation under Article 53 (art. 53) of the convention to abide

state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 26 September 2000, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide

    The High Contracting Parties undertake to abide by the final judgment of the Court in any case to which they are parties. 2.

Article 41 was not ready for decision, and consequently, reserved it and postponed it for a later stage; Stressing the obligation of every state, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide

    For the same reasons the Court does not find it necessary to examine the Government’s objection (see paragraph 21 above) that the application was inadmissible for failure to abide by the