Departures from this principle are justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see, for instance, Ryabykh , cited above, §   52). 18.

Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 2   December 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , President ,   Anne Louise Bormann,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Valentin

Firstly, he stated that the applicant had been convicted on the basis of statements made under torture.

Therefore, the complaint made by the parents and siblings applicants is manifestly ill-founded, as the two groups are not comparable. 11.

However, even assuming that after June 2003 the applicant could make use of the new remedy, any acceleration of the proceedings at that moment would have come too late to make up for the excessive delay

The President made a decision on priority treatment of the application (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court). 5.

    On 6 December 2007 the public prosecutor’s office made its submissions, charging Dr J.V. with homicide by gross ( grosseira ) negligence.

The Savov family made the room habitable and now three people live in it, while six other (applicants 18 to 23) live in the room in which they were all originally living.

Their depositions were read out in the court and the witness “T.G.D.” also made oral submissions to the same effect.

It thus finds that this complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on it (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of   Valentin   Câmpeanu v.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Valentina Pavličić.

    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and taking into account the previous awards made by the Court to the applicant (compare Ivanov and Others v.

    The applicant also complained that her right to property had been breached as a result of the failure of the authorities to compensate her for the loss of value of the award made to her on

These plaintiffs claimed in particular that demolishing the houses would make the members of their families homeless and expose them all to precarious living conditions.

    The applicants did not make any claim in respect of costs and expenses. Default interest 30.

Consequently, there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

    Applicant’s description of alleged ill-treatment: Traffic police vehicle suddenly blocked car driven by applicant, obliging him to make emergency stop.

  1667/11, § 29, 11 May 2021; and, mutatis mutandis , Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).