Nevertheless, for completeness’ sake, of those cases, the Constitutional Court had upheld the State appeal in three cases [5] , thus reducing the compensation which had been awarded to the applicants at

Those assessments reached me today.

However, no efforts had been eventually made to analyse those issues.

As regards the difference in treatment between those serving more and those serving less than fifteen years, while such a distinction did not of itself suggest unlawful discrimination, it nevertheless

However, those proceedings were ultimately discontinued as being time-barred.

The courts had refused to implement the applicable procedures for prisoners with serious illnesses, on the ground that only those who had been convicted with final effect were eligible for them.

The Court went on to examine whether Slovenia and Serbia were responsible for the failure of those banks to repay their debts to the applicants.

Thus, the lustration procedure in Poland was not aimed at punishing acts committed during the communist regime.

In the first-instance judgment in those proceedings, the court had erroneously established that D.M. had not been previously convicted and thus had considered that a fine was a sufficient sanction, without

There was no evidence before the Court which would entitle it to conclude that any of those killings, save those which resulted in convictions, involved the unlawful or excessive use of force by members

Finally, in 2003 the proceedings were terminated as prosecution of those responsible had become time-barred.

The public prosecutor’s office took no action against those involved in the incidents.

In other words, those acts had not been carried out promptly.

  330/2018, its judgment had had no practical effect for him and thus could not be regarded as having been an effective judicial remedy.

The court noted that one of those employees was E.K., whom the applicants had consulted.

Having considered that there was no effective remedy, as they claimed before this Court, they could have at any time during those proceedings, or immediately thereafter, lodged an application with this

The question thus arose whether all reasonable investigative steps had been carried out with a view to elucidating – to the extent medically possible – the cause of T.P.’s death.

The relevant part of that decision reads as follows: “The question of the defendant’s liability was in those [earlier] proceedings the preliminary question on which the court decided in those proceedings