CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD007837713

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2018

11 janvier 2018

  78377/13, the Court notes that the applicant died on 23 November 2015, while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle

Page 22 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1126JUD000586211

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2020

26 novembre 2020

    The Court notes that Mr Slobodan Šljivančanin died on 6 March 2014 while the case was pending before the Court. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174274

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2017

17 mai 2017

A stamp was placed on the back of the invitation, indicating that it was “duly delivered” while a handwritten note stating that “there was no such company or person at that address” featured next to it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD000971417

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

    The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 16240/17 died on 30   March 2024, while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14573

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2026

3 mars 2026

Moreover, where only a part of a person’s “old” foreign-currency savings had thus been repaid, those States had been responsible for the rest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD000122918

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2024

6 juin 2024

    The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 1229/18 died on 1   December 2020, while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1207DEC002290693

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 1994

7 décembre 1994

   The applicant further complains of the unfairness of the Public Prosecutor's decision dismissing her request to start criminal proceedings against the persons who allegedly acted aggressively

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2016

29 novembre 2016

He will be able to help you and explain what you explained to me so kindly when you came to my house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD000095017

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

    The Court notes that in the present case what is in issue is not an act by the State but the alleged inadequacy of the protection afforded by the domestic courts to the applicants’ private

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174333

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2017

15 mai 2017

apparently on their way to take part in a public event in the form of a meeting ( митинг ) organised by the local branch of the Communist Party that was scheduled to start at 1 p.m.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13978

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2022

6 décembre 2022

What had previously been the six‑month time‑limit for application to the Court under Article   35 § 1 of the Convention was reduced to four months by Article   4 of Protocol No.   15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD002470516

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2019

10 janvier 2019

Such limitation period starts running from the cessation of the criminal activity”. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 7 OF THE CONVENTION 29 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD002486704

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2012

4 décembre 2012

The three officers involved gave written explanations of what had occurred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD002676605

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

The judge stated that the contents of the statement were crucial to the prosecution on count one as there was no other direct evidence of what took place; “putting it bluntly, no statement, no count one

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0520JUD002198093

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1999

20 mai 1999

The second part of Mr Lindberg’s report, which was published by Bladet   Tromsø on 20 July 1988, contained the following statements ( while deleting with black ink the names of the crew members referred

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC006659216

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

    They also submitted that while in prison, once diagnosed with tuberculosis, the first applicant had received adequate medical assistance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD006254000

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

Article 41 § 2 “Citizens shall have the right to information from state bodies or agencies on any matter of legitimate interest to them, unless the information is a state secret or a secret protected by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0210DEC001844691

Admin. suprême

10 février 1993

10 février 1993

        The applicant company applied to the appropriate authority (Magistrat der Stadt Wien) for assessment of a maximum rent permissible under the 1981 Rent Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211176

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2021

1 juillet 2021

She is worried what would happen if she gets pregnant and the foetus is found to be defective. Application no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC000678802

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

by the Deputy Prosecutor General on the basis of information obtained by the police, had mentioned that the applicant was engaged in forging passports and visas and organising travel to the United States

Source officielle