ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 8.     The applicant complained of the excessive length of judicial review of detention before the ordinary courts.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention 11.

Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 6 .

Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 14.

He was only allowed a one-hour walk per day.   He also alleged that, on contracting hepatitis, the prison’s medical assistance was inadequate.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.     The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.

and James LAZARIS against Albania lodged on 18 November 2006   STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicants, Mr James Lazaris, formerly known as Panajot Llazari, and Mr Peter Lazaris, formerly known

    The Court therefore concludes that the applicant cannot claim to be a “victim” of the alleged violation.

xa0; FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 26049/18 H.A. against Italy   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 14   February 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Péter

SECTION DECISION Application no. 48781/19 Zbigniew KOSTKA against Poland   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 28   May   2024 as a Committee composed of:   Péter

In particular, the Court has found that an effective remedy is available in Hungary to provide redress for the alleged grievances (see Szaxon v.   Hungary (dec.), no.

The families of the deceased refused to take the money which had been offered (about 11,000 USD per family).

    Alleged violation of Article   8 of the Convention 20.

She alleged that there was a reasonable suspicion that an offence specified in Article 160 § 2 of the Criminal Code has been committed.

that the case originated in an application (No. 17440/90) against the United Kingdom, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 22 June 1990 under Article   25 of the Convention by Mr Peter

.sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } Published on 27 February 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no. 3023/22 Peeter