AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC002774495
9 septembre 2003
9 septembre 2003
A party is entitled to a legally valid decision in respect of every de facto restriction on contact.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC005619300
16 septembre 2003
16 septembre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC000051502
16 septembre 2003
16 septembre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly admissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC005021099
23 septembre 2003
23 septembre 2003
Partly to protect your privacy, only the head of security or his deputy will listen to such tape recordings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC005398400
23 septembre 2003
23 septembre 2003
Ader, a lawyer practising in Paris, and Mr A. de Chaisemartin, a barrister at the Conseil d'Etat and the Court of Cassation.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925DEC006952901
25 septembre 2003
25 septembre 2003
applied Article 333 of the Code of Civil Procedure according to which judgments could be re-considered in case of discovery of significant circumstances which were not and could not have been known to the party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1002DEC005426800
2 octobre 2003
2 octobre 2003
According to the Government, the “new” Qufaj Co sh.p.k, the applicant before the Court, is not the same company as that which was a party to the national proceedings, not only because the company did not
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4669
2 octobre 2003
2 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4657
7 octobre 2003
7 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1014DEC004979099
14 octobre 2003
14 octobre 2003
Partly inadmissible;Partly admissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1021DEC004231798
21 octobre 2003
21 octobre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC007380201
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
In spite of this transfer, the Court points out that she remained a party to the proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004521499
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC005017899
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
A party to criminal or civil proceedings may solicit the intervention of such officials for a review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC004641299
31 mars 2005
31 mars 2005
the applicant was taken into custody by policemen from the Anti-Terrorism Branch of the Diyarbakır Security Directorate on suspicion of his membership of an illegal organisation, namely the Workers' Party
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC005463200
31 mars 2005
31 mars 2005
A party to criminal or civil proceedings could solicit the intervention of such officials for a review.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC003218602
5 avril 2005
5 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC001824902
5 avril 2005
5 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0426DEC007442001
26 avril 2005
26 avril 2005
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0428DEC003313202
28 avril 2005
28 avril 2005
The applicant concludes that there was a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) in that he was not afforded an opportunity to have knowledge of, and to comment on, the observations filed by the other party
Source officiellePage 22 sur 2232