CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004358709
24 juillet 2012
43425/98, § 32, 27 May 2003). 57.
Page 22 sur 4434
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506DEC002167007
6 mai 2010
Circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC005258699
11 décembre 2001
On 18 May 1998 it dismissed T’s request to impose a fine on a witness.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0408DEC001581402
8 avril 2003
In April 1993, the Auditor became aware for the first time of handwritten notes made by the Director of Housing during meetings in the period May 1986 to October 1989.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217164
6 avril 2022
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1049247-1085914
13 juillet 2004
Procedure and composition of the Court The application was lodged on 16 May 2001 and declared admissible on 27 May 2003.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113532
1 octobre 2008
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. RP’s child (‘KP’) was born prematurely on 7 May 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC006261900
5 juillet 2005
In his submission the applicant denied having made the above-mentioned statements.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0209JUD001744090
9 février 1995
that may be realised at the time the confiscation order is made is less than the amount the court assesses to be the value of his proceeds of drug trafficking, the amount to be recovered in the defendant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003321896
23 octobre 2001
It was further noted that the mother was not prepared to accept the charges relating to this man and stated that they had plans to marry in the Spring as they had had a close relationship for many years
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD001891910
6 décembre 2011
He made a similar complaint to the military prosecutor’s office on 15 May 2009, describing in detail his ill-treatment and the conditions of his detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002098110
17 avril 2014
(see, among many other authorities, Sürek v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC000929602
23 novembre 2006
The attempt of attachment made in April 1997 was also fruitless.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115546
5 décembre 2012
Mentioning two recent cases in which he had participated as plaintiff, including their file numbers and the courts, he made an analysis of the alleged judicial errors and made criticism of the attitude
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-157483
31 août 2015
No appeal may be entered against this ruling.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC003062313
6 décembre 2016
such other document or evidence as he may deem adequate for the purpose of this article.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0706DEC000456702
6 juillet 2006
Accordingly, it was adjourned until 25 May 2001. On 25 May 2001 the applicant’s counsel request to adjourn the hearing due to his involvement in another set of proceedings.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0124DEC000332167
24 janvier 1968
It may be noted, Mr Secretary General, that as His Majesty the King of the Hellenes has emphasised, and as His Excellency, the Prime Minister has reiterated on many occasions, Greece will revert to normal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC002895795
1 décembre 1997
The official position is that an amendment may only be made if the error occurred when the birth was registered.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146915
10 septembre 2014
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.