CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

88 661 résultats pour « Mady »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004358709

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

  43425/98, §   32, 27   May 2003). 57.

Source officielle

Page 22 sur 4434

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506DEC002167007

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2010

6 mai 2010

    Circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC005258699

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2001

11 décembre 2001

On 18 May 1998 it dismissed T’s request to impose a fine on a witness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0408DEC001581402

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2003

8 avril 2003

In April 1993, the Auditor became aware for the first time of handwritten notes made by the Director of Housing during meetings in the period May 1986 to October 1989.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217164

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2022

6 avril 2022

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1049247-1085914

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2004

13 juillet 2004

    Procedure and composition of the Court   The application was lodged on 16 May 2001 and declared admissible on 27 May 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113532

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2008

1 octobre 2008

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. RP’s child (‘KP’) was born prematurely on 7 May 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC006261900

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

In his submission the applicant denied having made the above-mentioned statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0209JUD001744090

Admin. suprême

9 février 1995

9 février 1995

that may be realised at the time the confiscation order is made is less than the amount the court assesses to be the value of his proceeds of drug trafficking, the amount to be recovered in the defendant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003321896

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2001

23 octobre 2001

It was further noted that the mother was not prepared to accept the charges relating to this man and stated that they had plans to marry in the Spring as they had had a close relationship for many years

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD001891910

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

He made a similar complaint to the military prosecutor’s office on 15 May 2009, describing in detail his ill-treatment and the conditions of his detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002098110

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2014

17 avril 2014

(see, among many other authorities, Sürek v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1123DEC000929602

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2006

23 novembre 2006

The attempt of attachment made in April 1997 was also fruitless.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115546

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2012

5 décembre 2012

Mentioning two recent cases in which he had participated as plaintiff, including their file numbers and the courts, he made an analysis of the alleged judicial errors and made criticism of the attitude

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-157483

Admin. suprême

31 août 2015

31 août 2015

No appeal may be entered against this ruling.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC003062313

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2016

6 décembre 2016

such other document or evidence as he may deem adequate for the purpose of this article.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0706DEC000456702

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2006

6 juillet 2006

Accordingly, it was adjourned until 25 May 2001. On 25 May 2001 the applicant’s counsel request to adjourn the hearing due to his involvement in another set of proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0124DEC000332167

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 1968

24 janvier 1968

It may be noted, Mr Secretary General, that as His Majesty the King of the Hellenes has emphasised, and as His Excellency, the Prime Minister has reiterated on many occasions, Greece will revert to normal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC002895795

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1997

1 décembre 1997

  The official position is that an amendment may only be made if the error occurred when the birth was registered.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146915

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2014

10 septembre 2014

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle