Mrs N.N. introduced a claim before the Koper Labour Court, requesting that the termination of her employment be declared null and void.

les observations de la société civile professionnelle MASSE-DESSEN, GEORGES et THOUVENIN, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général LECOCQ ; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : LAMOURE

In 1991 the applicant and B.G. initiated labour dispute proceedings against company S. before the Ljubljana Labour and Social Court, claiming severance pay in the amount of twenty-four monthly salaries

UNE PROPRIETE RURALE ; QUE CE BAIL FUT CONSENTI POUR UNE DUREE DE 9 ANS COMMENCANT A COURIR LE 15 MARS 1968 POUR LES BATIMENTS ET LES PATURES ET POUR LA RECOLTE A FAIRE EN 1969 POUR LES TERRES A LABOUR

Sur le moyen unique, pris en ses deux branches : Attendu, selon les énonciations des juges du fond, que la société Lamoine a livré des articles de menuiserie à la société Labouesse, qui était chargée

On 2 August 1996, following the applicant’s appeal, the Munich Regional Labour Court, at an oral hearing, confirmed the decision of the Labour Court and did not admit an appeal on points of law.

On 19 June 2013 the applicant introduced labour proceedings before the Barcelona Labour Court no. 33.

The applicant union brought the case before the Labour Court.

    On 9 February 2000 the Labour Court heard the expert’s opinion.

On 21 September 1944 the German police transported him to a labour camp located in Schattensdorf. He was interned there and performed forced labour until 8 May 1945.

and labour proceedings existed.

    On 10 August 2007 the applicant requested the University to be employed under a permanent labour contract based on Law no. 5620. 8.

relative à la prise de contrôle conjoint de la société Primonial Holding par les sociétés Crédit Mutuel Arkéa, Primonial Management, Blackfin et Latour Capital

La société Cabinet RC Labouze est l'expert de la société MS Amlin Insurance.

Relevant domestic law           The provisions which regulate proceedings in the Labour Court and the composition of the Labour Court are laid down in the 1974 Litigation

Having found that the dismissal was unlawful, the Lübeck Labour Court however dismissed the applicant’s claim for continued employment until the labour proceedings had been completed.

  By a letter of 15 December 1994 the applicant informed the Labour Office that he was obliged to look after his parents and requested that co-operation between him and the Labour Office be temporarily

et ensemencées en blé dur, orge d'hiver ou triticale, qu'il dispose d'un matériel (tracteur, charrue, andaineur...) nécessaire au labour et à la récolte et qu'il est également amené à vendre une partie