CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213JUD004832120
13 décembre 2022
The Family Code and placement on the Register for full adoption 44 .
Page 22 sur 1237
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD004270710
7 février 2017
Everyone has the right to respect for his [or her] private and family life ... 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0926JUD000496211
26 septembre 2013
No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD002044011
19 janvier 2017
A draft bill for the amendment of the Family Code, posted on the website of the Bulgarian Ministry of Justice on 29 August 2016, envisages repealing Article 127a of the 2009 Family Code.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD004468414
8 juin 2023
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14367
27 août 2024
Where the family was in detention, while mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other’s company constituted a fundamental element of family life, it could not be inferred from that that the sole
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0325JUD003813420
25 mars 2025
He had spoken of things that they would do together, as a family, in the future.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD003087917
13 octobre 2022
ECLI:CEDH:002-9632
18 février 1991
Applicant's alleged offences: all went back to when he had been an adolescent – proceedings had been brought in the criminal courts in respect of only some of them, which had been spread over a fairly
cr
613725f3cd58014677421cc5
27 février 2002
Mohtar et Farid Y... du chef de faux en écriture et usage, a confirmé l'ordonnance de non-lieu rendue par le juge d'instruction ; Vu l'article 575, alinéa 2, 6, du Code de procédure pénale ; Vu le
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:C300048
25 janvier 2024
[V] donnait lieu à un paiement en nature par des pots de miel et de la farine de châtaignes et qu'il continuait à lui donner une partie de sa production en contrepartie de l'exploitation des parcelles
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:C300710
12 octobre 2022
travaux supplémentaires » motif pris de ce que celui-ci, « en charge d'une mission d'exécution, n'était en charge d'aucune de ces missions d'études préliminaires », à savoir l'étude de faisabilité (FAISA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0801JUD004772110
1 août 2013
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD002126714
3 octobre 2017
The family lived in Minneapolis. A US passport was issued in M.’s name. 8. On 10 May 2010 S. obtained permanent resident status in the USA. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006JUD005845513
6 octobre 2015
[The applicant’s] family has been classified as a family unfit to educate ( “needucogenă” ) since 26 September 2011.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD005436608
20 avril 2021
In Ms Ch.’s opinion, the applicant and his family members had come to find out who the child looked like. 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD002328008
6 octobre 2016
On 18 May 1999, upon the applicant’s request, the Cologne Family Court (“the Family Court”) granted the applicant two visitation periods per week.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918JUD005076920
18 septembre 2025
On 18/01/2019 the first applicant’s wife took the second applicant to Russia to visit her family with the first applicant’s consent.
613725c8cd580146774207e1
20 octobre 1998
observations de la société civile professionnelle MONOD et COLIN, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général GERONIMI ; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : - La société SOPACLIF FARY
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0929DEC007663912
29 septembre 2015
In addition, the representative informed the Court that the applicant’s widower and daughter, Mr Sibo Bogućanin and Ms Farisa Bogućanin, had been declared as her heirs and that they had expressed the wish