In its view its function was limited to awarding fair compensation for the period during which the applicants were denied the peaceful possession of their property against an inadequate amount of compensation

The defendants denied their guilt throughout the proceedings. 6.     Initially, the investigation was conducted by the Investigation Department of the Kyiv Police Directorate.

N.T. and L.B. denied the allegations that they had been involved in the killing of Abdulvahit Narin and claimed that they had taken part in the clashes against the PKK in order to ensure security in Kulp

The prosecutor then questioned police officer Z. who denied beating the applicant and further claimed that none of the police officers of the Oktyabrskiy district police station matched the description

Section 6(4) sets out the approach to be followed by the court: “(a) it must decide whether the defendant has a criminal lifestyle; (b) if it decides that he has a criminal lifestyle it must decide whether

As to the applicant’s allegation of ill-treatment, the court heard evidence from several police officers who denied any coercion.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 August 2002, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Anthony William Jones, is a United Kingdom

    In view of the above, and bearing in mind that the Government did not raise an objection in respect of the new domestic remedy in the instant case, the Court decides to pursue the examination

    The decision referred to the statements of Z. and V., who denied the allegations of ill-treatment.

    The five applicants, Bridget McDermott, Elizabeth Bissett, Mr Edward and Mrs Patricia Kennedy as well as Christine Keegan, are Irish nationals who live in Dublin.

/06) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Eduard

(vii)   Recognition devices for registration plates under section 54(4b) 31 .

Débats à l'audience publique du 8 Avril 2025, devant Marc SALAÜN, Président du Tribunal, statuant en matière de référé, assisté d'Edouard FOURNIER, Greffier associé, Décision rendue en premier ressort

respondent Government on 13 February 1995 and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant on 10 March 1995;        Having deliberated;        Decides

However, the prosecutor denied their request, relying on an opinion from medical experts that performing an autopsy more than three months after the baby’s death would not give any results because of the

Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Mr Edward

The court was required to decide the case within 48 hours.

The clinic staff, namely doctor L. and nurse B., denied tying her up. 17.     On 31 August 2003 the applicant’s daughter had a high fever.

    The Court’s task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see, inter alia , Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16   December 1992, § 34, Series A no. 247-B).