Thus, in the present case the delay is thirty years (from the entry into force of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for Bulgaria in 1992 onwards). 14.

redress at domestic level for the delay, and she was to receive her flat by the end of November 2022.

redress at domestic level for that delay, and he was to receive his flat by the end of November 2022.

.3222-5-1 et suivants , R.3211-42 et suivants du Code de la Santé Publique ORDONNANCE STATUANT SUR UNE DEMANDE DE MAINTIEN DE LA MESURE DE CONTENTION Le 08 avril 2024 à H ; Devant Nous, Frédérique DELPY

On 2 September 1997 the applicant complained about undue delays in the proceedings to the president of the Košice Regional Court ( Krajský súd ).

She claimed that the authorities were to blame for the delay resulting from the jurisdictional dispute that arose between the Pleven and Sofia district courts as well as for the lengthy delay in processing

In accordance with the Commission's case-law,   the Government is not only answerable for the delays caused by the Council of State but also for the delays caused by the administrative authorities

  He alleged, in particular, that the judges had decided on his claim erroneously and that they had caused delays in the proceedings.

07/12/2020 1 year(s) and 8   month(s) and 7   day(s)   Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - Three appeals of detention were decided on with 2-month delays.

    A delay in the execution of a judgment may be justified in particular circumstances.

This demand, which must be submitted to the prosecutor at once, must be dealt with by the prosecutor without delay. The outcome of the review must be notified to the person making the demand.”

This demand, which must be submitted to the prosecutor at once, must be dealt with by the prosecutor without delay. The outcome of the review must be notified to the person making the demand.”

Accordingly, this delay amounted approximately to one year and eleven months.

The applicant made a preliminary application to dismiss it on the ground of delay, but the judge held that, despite the delay, a fair trial would still be possible.

The aggregated delay incurred therefrom amounted to approximately four months.

With regard to the applicant’s conduct, the Court accepts the Government’s argument that there was a month delay attributable to her.

Delays imputable to the conduct of the District Court exceeded 3 years.

The Court finds no substantial delays in the subsequent proceedings before the District Court.

    On 5 May 1994 the applicant complained to the Ministry of Justice about delays in the proceedings and that the there had been shortcomings in the way his case was dealt with.