Article 41 – No causal link had been established between the alleged pecuniary damage and the violations found.

  In 1998 the Bremen Regional Court granted the applicant leave to sue for damages, as her detention had been illegal under German law.

          In July 1985 the applicant brought a civil action for damages against Dr. B., a medical doctor, and a pharmaceutical company.

    Damage 29.     The applicant claimed 50,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage. 30.

: 4   000 euros; Costs and expenses: 500 euros 22/04/2003 17/03/2003 None Geoffrey Mitchell and Louis Holloway 44808/98 17/12/2002final on 21/05/2003 Non-pecuniary damages: 5   000 euros; Costs

    As regards the applicant’s complaint of an absence of an effective remedy under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, again the Court refers to its constant case-law that the Turkish legal system

    In January 2009 the first applicant brought proceedings for damages under the Code of Administrative Procedure, as related to the State and Municipalities Responsibility for Damage Act 1988

He also has to be cocky at his pad, as young Mandarinettes are demanding, and age, fat, cholesterol, triglycerides and constant fear of those damnable genital warts ( kondiloma pustih ) have caught up

    The applicant claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. The Government considered the claim to be excessive. 20.

Consequently, any other remedy available to the applicant, including a claim for damages, had stood limited chances of success.

  Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Total 9 000 EUR 860 EUR 9 860 EUR Paid

    Pecuniary damage 33.

The conditions of detention were plainly inappropriate for the applicant’s severe disability, placing him for about three years in a situation which could not but arouse in him constant feelings of anxiety

  COURT'S ASSESSMENT OF THE FACTS Court, in line with constant case-law, accepts facts as found by Commission - finds it established that applicant, having been detained incommunicado for at least

Applicants held in airport's transit zone for twenty days - left to their own devices for most of that time: placed under strict and constant police surveillance and left without any legal and social assistance

Article 14 in conjunction with Article   8, but refused her claim for compensation, stating that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for the non-pecuniary damage

    Pecuniary damage 41.     The applicant claimed MDL 103,892 (approximately EUR 6,500) for pecuniary damage incurred as a result of the delay in obtaining his money. 42.

Dans son assignation, la Société CABOT SECURISATION EUROPE LIMITED demande à la juridiction, sous le bénéfice de l’exécution provisoire, de : - constater qu’elle justifie de sa qualité à agir ; -constater

[T]he court may award to the injured person an adequate sum in pecuniary compensation for the damage suffered.”