Pursuant to the Parole Board Rules 1992 which came into force on 1 October 1992, a prisoner is entitled to an oral hearing, to disclosure of all evidence before the Parole Board and to legal representation

Before the Migration Board ( Migrationsverket ), they claimed, inter alia , the following.

The opinions were submitted to the Appellate Board.

Juan, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de PAU, chambre correctionnelle, en date du 10 mai 2000, qui, pour détention à bord de filets non autorisés, les a condamnés chacun à 80 000 francs d'amende,

d'assurance maladie (CPAM) des Hauts-de-Seine, dont le siège est ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 16 mai 1995 par la cour d'appel de Versailles (5e Chambre sociale), au profit : 1°/ de la société Boyauderie

On 30   November   1993 the Board refused the applicant’s appeal without an oral hearing which the applicant had requested.

  However, it quashed the Provincial Board's decision insofar as the Board had refused to assume jurisdiction concerning the issues of alternative compensation parcels and monetary compensation.

    the Accident Board and the Insurance Court failed to communicate to him several documents which the insurance company had submitted to the Accident Board; 3.

les salariés intéressés et qu'elle tendait au respect par la compagnie Air France des dispositions de l'article L. 122-12 du Code du travail, par la confirmation des qualifications de commandant de bord

          The Health Inspectors appealed to the Central Medical Disciplinary Board (Centraal Medisch Tuchtcollege).

    On 14 January 1999 the Accident Board issued a decision rejecting her appeal with regard to the income.

Section 34(4) provided:     “The Board shall not give a direction ... unless -   (a) the Secretary of State has referred the prisoner’s case to the Board; (b) the Board is satisfied that

relative à la prise de contrôle conjoint du groupe Bompard par Apax Partners SAS et Compagnie Marco Polo SAS

    On an unknown date the Rzeszów Social Security Board asked the Main Social Security Board’s doctor ( Główny Lekarz Orzecznik ) to inform it whether the applicant’s daughter required the permanent

    On 10 November 1998 the Appeals Board upheld the Immigration Board's decision.

The Board based its decision on the five publications referred to by company F. The decision was made by S and R, senior research engineers of the Board's Technical Office no. II.

On 3 April 1998 the Governor rejected an appeal against the decision of 12 November 1997 lodged by the Social Security Board, considering that the Board had no standing in the proceedings.

  On 7 July the applicant asked to be assisted by his counsel in the hearing before the Board, scheduled for 10 July.

Specifically, by a judgment of 25   February 2010 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the CBA’s Executive Board’s decision of 17 October 2009.