In view of the overriding principle of the well-being of the child because of the severity of the suspicions raised against the children’s father, the provisional measure had also been proportionate.

Another officer: - Alexander Andreyevich, we need to get the convoy group ready. We have to take all three buses there.

The claims by the plaintiffs F. and B. are likewise unjustified because the statements by the defendant did not mention any names, still less the plaintiff’s names.

He later became one of the best-known opposition leaders, a founder of the political party the Union of Right Forces, and subsequently of the political movement Solidarnost. A.

The applicant claimed that he had resisted boarding because of a genuine fear of persecution if he was sent back to Sierra Leone and because of his poor psychological state after his lengthy detention.

In addition, the cells were usually filled with smoke because the majority of detainees smoked. There was no functioning ventilation in the cells.

Pursuant to the relevant legislation the applicant, as his wife, automatically became joint holder of the specially protected tenancy. 5.

    A hearing scheduled for 6 April 2006 was adjourned at the applicant’s request because he wanted to find legal representation. 9.

He further alleged that the contract had been signed under duress because of circumstances arising from the war in Croatia.

The five individual applicants, Mr   Boris Petkov Borisov, Mr Georgi Alexandrov Kirilov, Ms Iskra Borisova Mladenova, Mr Tassi Tsenov Tassev and Mr Petko Borisov Traikov are Bulgarian nationals who

    The applicant, Mr Alexandru Draci, is a Ukrainian national, who was born in 1956 and lives in Toronto. He is represented before the Court by Mr   V. Nagacevschi and Mr V.

He further submitted that there had been a breach of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention because, after he had been sentenced, the sentencing regime had changed so that for

He further stated that because of a traumatic event in her life the applicant became agitated, trembled and had trouble expressing herself when subjected to stress.

and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a United Kingdom national, Mr Stephen Alexander

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

“The jury majority voted guilty because it could do no other.” “The medical evidence was overwhelming.”

    As concerns the remaining applications, the Court finds that it does not need to rule on the preliminary objections raised by the Government because these applications are in any event inadmissible

    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 20   October 2020, which they had been unable to execute because nine of the fourteen applicants in the case of Hreamătă and Others

  1907/15; however, the Court finds that it does not need to rule on it because the application is inadmissible in any event, for the reasons presented below.